No, not you artists with your own dark rooms, 8 x 10 or larger cameras and perhaps are fond of the more unique or arcane printing methods. Not to say you can't chime in if you wish too.
I'm more asking the folks who take their keeper trannies to the lab for Chromira/Lightjet prints or perhaps have their own LF printer, probably shoot mostly color, are not fully professional and have , say .... $10k or @20k invested in equipment but not $30k, $40k, or even more.
Will you be tempted to pick up a 22MP back when they come below $10k? Do you think you would continue to shoot LF if you had such a back? Or will it take more megapixels and or cheaper prices to entice you? Do you think about putting a digital back on a monorail camera or would a Hartblei tilt shift lens on a MF camera be enough?
Personally I can't say for sure what I will do. I certainly enjoy shooting film today and really see no reason to stop even if I had a Phase One 22MP back right now. However ... if I found I could be more creative, my images were sharper and I could get more tonal range into my prints with digital I'd be hard pressed to keep using film. Certain respected pros are making such claims right now.
I'm not asking this question of pros who shoot hundreds of images in a day when working. Really I'm talking to the fine art producer who is anything but high volume.
Bookmarks