Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 78

Thread: A poll about your field notes

  1. #51

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    Posts
    72

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    Really lousy my memory is,
    So detailed notes I write and write.
    F-stop, factors and all the biz,
    I put it down and keep it tight,
    Three pages worth, so fast, it's a wiz.

    Sometimes, when the shot is right,
    I'm having so much fun, that is,
    I get so lost within the sight.
    kinda like when we were kids,
    it's then you know, I forget to write!


    Not very good, I know, but poetry isn't I want to be famous for...

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Oz
    Posts
    153

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    Quote Originally Posted by pablo batt View Post
    leave spreadsheets for accountants.
    Please refer my earlier post: I AM an accountant - but I also enjoy making images with my LF gear.

    Cheers

  3. #53
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,169

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    date, film holder no., film & format, subject/location, low reading, high reading, N, EI, Filter & factor, Reciprocity, Bellows Ext, Adjusted N (if any due to filters), Exposure,
    Developer.

    If the subject permits, these are filled in before exposure. When I'm rushed, the bolded headings absolutely must be filled in, otherwise I will forget.
    Sometimes a sketch the subject and write notes about lighting, weather, how windy, etc. Funny thing though, when I look at the negatives years later, I can remember the situation quite clearly, and events leading up to it.

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    I prefer to bracket since, for example, shutter speed can vary with temperature – but despite making this and other occasional technical considerations, I’m certainly not going to allow them to interrupt my pleasure by accounting for and recording them. That’s neither helpful nor pleasurable to me.

    Indeed, doing so is plain distracting – and besides, I just don’t like the difficulty of it all.

    Let’s put it this way: when I consider the technical part of my image, I begin losing the enjoyment and immediacy of just “being there.”

    Heck, I can be more direct still: The whole photographic process is secondary to me. It interferes with why I’m out there in the first place – to soak it up, to take a deep breath, to sit back and enjoy the un-mediated scene through the best “camera” I will ever possess, my own eyes.

    Yes, I recognize this approach runs counter to what many others have shared in this thread. And I’m pleased to acknowledge that approach – even if I don’t accept it, even if it’s all quite alien to me – since, after all, you are generous enough to acknowledge mine.
    now why would i want to waffle on like that, Europeans get to the point ,we dont need to overplay politeness , we are thicker skinned than us citizens lol

  5. #55

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    628

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    Safelights are red
    Bad stop bath is blue
    Damn neg is overdeveloped
    Should have been N minus two

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    644

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    I prefer to bracket since, for example, shutter speed can vary with temperature – but despite making this and other occasional technical considerations, I’m certainly not going to allow them to interrupt my pleasure by accounting for and recording them. That’s neither helpful nor pleasurable to me.

    Indeed, doing so is plain distracting – and besides, I just don’t like the difficulty of it all.

    Let’s put it this way: when I consider the technical part of my image, I begin losing the enjoyment and immediacy of just “being there.”

    Heck, I can be more direct still: The whole photographic process is secondary to me. It interferes with why I’m out there in the first place – to soak it up, to take a deep breath, to sit back and enjoy the un-mediated scene through the best “camera” I will ever possess, my own eyes.

    Yes, I recognize this approach runs counter to what many others have shared in this thread. And I’m pleased to acknowledge that approach – even if I don’t accept it, even if it’s all quite alien to me – since, after all, you are generous enough to acknowledge mine.


    Dude ..wtf?

    Are you going to sit here and tell me you couldn't quite understand him and yet can reword his sentiment for him

    Your revison sounds like an acedemic intellectual ass

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    644

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    I like the poetry

    I made a good contribution to this thread

  8. #58
    runs a monkey grinder Steve M Hostetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Beech Grove Indiana
    Posts
    2,293

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    a guy named ansel came up with the zone
    back when cars wound up and Percy Killbride (Pa Kettle) was half grown
    i asked this chic darlene why she's so set in her ways
    she said shut the fu.. up grasshopper can't you see i'm the master these days

    I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee
    i'll smoke you like a bad habbit if you mess with me
    I know you think I'm slow cause I go by the book
    but I'll run circles around you till you lose that look

    I know she won't answer my questions cause she's above all that
    so i'll just sit here and twiddle my thumbs like some snot nosed brat
    anymore when I hear she's in town
    i'll put my tail between my legs and run with a drooling frown

    I know you think i'm a pud for letting a girl pick on me
    but what you don't know is she's that bad roller derby queen from Tallahassee
    Last edited by Steve M Hostetter; 19-Aug-2009 at 18:54. Reason: miss spelled zone

  9. #59
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,275

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    I just list the basics on a stick-on post-it note. Lens, f/stop, shutter speed if it's worth noting, and the development time, which is calculated along with the exposure as its counterpart. I keep the notes coordinated with the negative through processing, then transfer the info to the negative sleeve, along with the date. On a few sleeves, if I think I'll be printing the negative again, I add printing info, like burn/dodge contour maps or contrast notes. Not a formula for replication, but a starting point for next time.

    I'm starting to think, though, that when making notes in the field, I should also list an excuse for why I won't like the negative. It would save time coming up with excuses later...
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  10. #60

    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    2,214

    Re: A poll about your field notes

    Quote Originally Posted by sun of sand View Post

    lovely cherry trees
    oh nooo oh no jesus please
    don't on ground glass sneeze

    Give it a title and you could win
    "A breathtaking view"

    or

    "A viewtaking breath"


    <ontopic>
    I used to take lots of notes, and still do when I'm trying anything new like dabbling in strobe lighting. But for my normal landscapes I work in areas I know, I use one film, which is colour so it only offers very restricted development manipulations, and I simply know how I like to expose it. Taking notes just drowns the muse in paperwork. I do bracket depth of field to cover my bases on the bokeh front.

    It helps that I never have any difficulty remembering where I took a particular shot. *When* causes me endless problems, but I can recall where I was standing, and find it on a large scale map, for several years after exposure. That reduces the need to note down subject details.
    </ontopic>

Similar Threads

  1. Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?
    By Skorzen in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 1-Feb-2008, 09:24
  2. Alt Process: Ziatype notes from the field...
    By Ed K. in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15-Sep-2007, 21:31
  3. Depth of Field Equations, Lens Design Assumptions and Soft Focus Lenses
    By Rory_3532 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2004, 18:00
  4. Yet another depth of field question
    By Leonard Evens in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2004, 04:00
  5. Diffraction and Lens Flare
    By Paul Mongillo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-Mar-2000, 13:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •