Page 69 of 71 FirstFirst ... 19596768697071 LastLast
Results 681 to 690 of 701

Thread: Bridges

  1. #681

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    132

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Mounier View Post
    That is a very nice shot. Regarding the softness of the distant tower, I looked at the full size Flickr page and noticed that there are a couple of other places that are inexplicably soft. From looking at the foreground and the land on the other side of the bridge, you obviously used a small aperture for great depth of field. It's sharp from side to side and top to bottom, except near that far tower, as if the neg has a bubble that affected the sharpness either in shooting or scanning. There is a similar "bubble" at the bottom, slightly right of center. There is no reason for that to be blurry. I don't think you made a mistake. I think something else is at play.
    I noticed that too. I can see it going from the foreground through the river up to that distant tower. The grain is homogenously sharp across the whole frame, so it must have been some issue when taking the shot. Something wrong with lens(or filter) maybe?

  2. #682

    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    187

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Mounier View Post
    That is a very nice shot. Regarding the softness of the distant tower, I looked at the full size Flickr page and noticed that there are a couple of other places that are inexplicably soft. From looking at the foreground and the land on the other side of the bridge, you obviously used a small aperture for great depth of field. It's sharp from side to side and top to bottom, except near that far tower, as if the neg has a bubble that affected the sharpness either in shooting or scanning. There is a similar "bubble" at the bottom, slightly right of center. There is no reason for that to be blurry. I don't think you made a mistake. I think something else is at play.
    Thanks for this. I think you're right - I can't see any way that the blurry areas can be caused by camera movements. I think it might be my yellow filter. I've just looked through my shots taken with this camera and lens and all the images where this issue occurs are ones where I used my yellow filter. No sign of out of focus areas in the others (except for stuff that is clearly a result of tilt or swing).

  3. #683

    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    187

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by notorius View Post
    I noticed that too. I can see it going from the foreground through the river up to that distant tower. The grain is homogenously sharp across the whole frame, so it must have been some issue when taking the shot. Something wrong with lens(or filter) maybe?
    Thanks for the reply. Yes, I think you're right. I don't think it's my lens as I have pictures where everything is fine. As with my reply above, I'm erring towards it being the yellow filter - all the shots I have with this problem have been taken while using that filter.

    I'll shoot my next few frames without any filters and see how they turn out. It'll be good to remove the cause of the problem, if disappointing that I had to find out the hard way.

  4. #684

    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    187

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by otto.f View Post
    A heavy truck that causes shakes?
    That would have to be a biiig truck! I think I would have noticed that much shaking without even taking a picture.

  5. #685

    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    187

    Re: Bridges

    Chamonix 045N-1
    Fujinon NW 135mm f/5.6
    Ilford HP5+ (with yellow filter)
    Ilfotec DD-X 1+4 9mins @ 20°


    Beneath the Humber Bridge by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr

  6. #686

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Purcellville, VA
    Posts
    1,886

    Re: Bridges

    Nice tonality!
    Philip Ulanowsky

    Sine scientia ars nihil est. (Without science/knowledge, art is nothing.)
    www.imagesinsilver.art
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/156933346@N07/

  7. #687

    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    187

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulophot View Post
    Nice tonality!
    Thanks.

  8. #688

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,538

    Re: Bridges

    Old Paper Mill Bridge, Phoenix, MD (39.50175567833534, -76.62253394967739)
    Canham 4x5 Wood
    90mm Super Angulon (?)
    Delta 100


  9. #689

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,484

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by djdister View Post
    Old Paper Mill Bridge, Phoenix, MD (39.50175567833534, -76.62253394967739)
    Canham 4x5 Wood
    90mm Super Angulon (?)
    Delta 100

    Yes!

  10. #690
    Roger Thoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA, Flagstaff AZ
    Posts
    1,618

    Re: Bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by djdister View Post
    Old Paper Mill Bridge, Phoenix, MD (39.50175567833534, -76.62253394967739)
    Canham 4x5 Wood
    90mm Super Angulon (?)
    Delta 100
    Very nicely done.

    Roger

Similar Threads

  1. Large Format Displacing Your Old Medium Format?
    By Ed K. in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 15-Jul-2010, 10:59
  2. What should be my next lens?
    By coops in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2007, 17:22
  3. gary bridges
    By garybridges in forum Introductions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 1-Aug-2006, 22:23

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •