Has anyone ever used the non folding Shen Hao TFC 45 ? What are the impressions ? Where can it be purchased (Jeff at Badger said to me that they are not importing this model) ? Has anyone ever purchased directly from the manufacturer ?
Has anyone ever used the non folding Shen Hao TFC 45 ? What are the impressions ? Where can it be purchased (Jeff at Badger said to me that they are not importing this model) ? Has anyone ever purchased directly from the manufacturer ?
This model is a 100% knock-off of the Ebony SW45. However, it has a very major flaw - the bellows it is equipped with are very stiff which means for shorter lenses, you need an additional set of bag bellows. The original Ebony SW45, on the other hand, is equipped with very flexible bellows which means that one set of bellows is used for everything. The idea of this camera is that it is supposed to be very easy and quick to use with wide angle lenses - the fact that the TFC requires bag bellows speaks volumes for the manufacturers understanding of the product. Having said that, I have used an Ebony SW45 extensively for shooting architecture - if you can do without rear shift, it's a great little camera and extremely fast to set up and shoot. Personally, I'd not buy a knock-off - if you can work around the disfunctionality of the TFC's bellows, I'm sure you could buy one direct from the manufacturer.
At a small fraction of the price of an Ebony, even with buying the accessory bag bellows (which I agree, ought to be the default for a camera like that), it's worth the try. I can't speak for the TFC, but I have one of the HZX 45 IIa models, and the bag bellows. The bag bellows is very nice, and it's only $99.
Scott
My point was that on this particular design, the need for bag bellows is a major flaw, not merely an inconvenience. Changing bellows every time you set-up to use a wide angle lens on a camera designed for using wide angle lenses is simply ridiculous.
Wouldn't the smarter user just leave the bag bellows on all the time?
Thanks for the answers to Scott, Dan and Franck. All of you stated a very good point. I forgot to mention in the posting that I already own a folding Shen Hao HZX 45 II and I am very pleased with it. My interest in the non folding version is due to the fact that it is slightly lighter and always "ready to use" when backpacking on the Dolomites (our Northern Italian mountains). I also own the Shen Hao bag bellows that are indeed very soft as Scott is stating. I measured them and they have a maximum draw of slightly more of 200 mm, so they are longer of the maximum draw allowed by the non folding camera (190 mm). The idea of Frank of leaving the bag bellows on the camera all the time is therefore winning. With this set up the camera will easy allow me to use my Nikkor 90 and 135 lenses. Then, using the 35 mm extension board of Ebony (that will fit on the Shen Hao), I could also use the 200 M Nikor that I own. This will take the actual bellows draw at 225 mm that at least teoretically (I would need here your opinion) should allow me to use the 200 for lanndscape. What do you think about the idea ?
I'm pretty sure that Shen Hao no longer produce this model due to the issues they faced after cloning the Ebony SW45.
Paul where did you get this information from?I'm pretty sure that Shen Hao no longer produce this model due to the issues they faced after cloning the Ebony SW45.
--paul owen 2006-01-29 02:41 PST
It is so tiring to keep hearing you whine about how Shem-Hao has cloned the ebony! You know what? I could list many camera names that came before Ebony, and I could sit here ranting on of every post that Ebony cloned there parts. I field camera is a pretty darn simple piece of equipment. They all look the same to some extent.
Since Shen-Hao virtually cloned all their other cameras from Ebony, why haven't they had problems with other models?
Frankly, some of the Chinese designs offered on eBay are quite original and look to be well made, so I am less skeptical of all Chinese cameras nowadays... Some of their gadgets are downright neat.
The original model (the TFC45) had a standard bellows attached and worked quite well, not flawed as Mr. Hutton has said numerous times. The short bellows is flexible enough for any lens down to a 65mm. Below that, the movements are limited, but lens coverage doesnn't allow much movement anyway, so it doesn't much matter.
The TFC45-IIA comes with a bag bellows atached, and a standard bellows can be fitted. The bag bellows works just fine through the entire extension of the bellows. I have one, and there IS no flaw. It works perfectly.
The TFC45 was only sold in China, and only a few were brought out by people who bought them there. The TFC45IIA was the export model, and is NOT(!!!!!) an Ebony clone. There are similarities, but IT IS A 4x5 NON_FOLDING FIELD CAMERA! HOW MUCH DIFFERENT CAN IT BE?
Bookmarks