safe haven for tiny formats

[tuco]

Cool tree shot, Peter.

[Jim Jones]

Speaking of curved roadbeds, I took this last night with a Canon 50/1.2 LTM:

The silhouetted rectilinear bridge contrasts with the graceful curve of the tracks to enhance our appreciation of an unusual "S" curve composition. Well seen and presented!

[goamules]

Thanks all, I also liked the way it turned out.

[Peter De Smidt]

Thank you, Chassis and Tuco. We were in Florida last week for a judo tournament, and we spent the last day in Orlando. While the kids were at an amusement park, my wife and I bummed around town. At one point, we visited a small park which had this cool tree. Having seen a lot of fine work with smart phones posted here, I gave it a shot with my 6s.

[chrism]

M2, Summilux 50, XP2, Rodinal stand, X1 scan:


Barrachois by chrism229, on Flickr

[chrism]

Well I think the Massive Development Chart has the time wrong for Pan F in Rodinal 1+100. The negatives are very dark, and overdeveloped (I know the meter is good in the camera so it's not overexposure). Still, rescued in LR.

OM2n, 28/2, Pan F, Rodinal 1+100 for one hour, X1 scan:

Inukshuk by chrism229, on Flickr

[jp]

Ken; Keep it up!
Ken inspired me a bit to get out and do some cloud photos after work today..


_DSC3558 by Jason Philbrook, on Flickr

I've also been shooting video of a lobster boat today. More like setting the recording camera on the water and directing the subject... And being elated with what we got.



This is my camera setup for that: Foam insulation rescued from the dump, zip ties to tie to the buoy and/or retrieve the camera, black tape holds a dead hard drive for a keel.

[Old_Dick]

JP, really nice style.

[Old_Dick]

Nice recovery Dr. Chris.

[tuco]

Well I think the Massive Development Chart has the time wrong for Pan F in Rodinal 1+100. The negatives are very dark, and overdeveloped (I know the meter is good in the camera so it's not overexposure). Still, rescued in LR.

OM2n, 28/2, Pan F, Rodinal 1+100 for one hour, X1 scan:

I've been using 1+50 @ 11 min for PanF with the agitation profile given in the documentation that came with my bottle of Rodinal. So far I'm pleased with the results. If I were to do 1+100 with an agitation profile, I'd just double the time to 22 minutes as a starting point. Is your 1-hour dev time you're using stand or semi-stand development?

I find Rodinal can give you over/under cooked results just on how little/much you agitate the film for a given time more so than other developers I've used. The contributions to the Massive Development Chart usually doesn't give you the agitation profile used. It's suppose to be the "standard" agitation for that developer according to the MDC. But it seems no two people agitate Rodinal the same. It would sure be nice if people reaffirmed the profile they used in the MDC just so everyone is on the same page.