Originally Posted by
macandal
So, if this is true, why is he bringing the "enlarger" part of this process if we're not there yet? We're still trying to get the negative right before we move on to printing. Or is he saying, "if you're going to print using a condenser enlarger, then your zones in your negative must read X for this zone, Y for this zone, and Z for this zone." If is the latter, then this just goes to prove that Ansel was not a writer AT ALL and that his books are in serious need of a major editing job by a professional.
Thanks guys.
(Still having problems determining my EI and N times, in case you're wondering.)
Bookmarks