For 9x12 (only for tripod work) I could chose between the Fomapan 100,200,400

What do you think, and has anyone some experience with them.

From the data sheet, the 200 has the same resolving power than the 100 and much better as the 400 (110:90). but in Schwarzschild tolerance, the 400 ist the best (1.5x at 1 sec) and the 200 the worst (3x at 1 sec) Is this a problem, as with tripod work and small apertures, you easily get to longer exposure times. Is the resultion differnce on the other hand relvant for large format (unless you want to make very large prints)?

I want to take foma for the beginning, as for example ilford sheets films cost 4 times as much.
or maybe you know other alternatives in the Foma price range...

Thanks