It occurs to me that now so much photography is manipulated and printed digitally, that the photographers vision of what the result should look like, is based at least partly and pssibly greatly, on what they can achieve in digital manipulation which they may very well not have been able to achieve photographically. Therefore I ask, is it a lie to call a digitallly manipulated image "Fine Art Photography" when in reality it would display more integrity if it were called "Fine Art digital manipulation from a photograph". Or should we just accept that digital manipulation has something to do with photography?