John sometimes I look at my own work and think that maybe I've got that percentage beat...by about (more like at least) .99%!
John sometimes I look at my own work and think that maybe I've got that percentage beat...by about (more like at least) .99%!
wasn't a slight towards anyone in particular, but most photography is as earth shattering as watching grass grow but it floats the maker's boat, and that's all that really counts, isn't it ?
there's gonna be a giant dumpster fire when im gone, but im enjoying myself like you ..
using a salt water bath to remove random bits of emulsion from a negative that has no image on it... is not photogrpahy nor is it creativity.
And if you read up about the mighty peanut, youd realize your trespassing into rather bad political ideology with that peanut comment.
If it's spelled "analogue" it must really be artsy.
Hey...I'd love to watch grass grow - it would be fascinating I think...maybe even earth shattering!but most photography is as earth shattering as watching grass grow
Watch grass grow, then have to mow - it's that time of year again.
Developing film in the field is pretty hardcore (not to mention voluntarily wrestling with a Mamiya C330). I have to admire her grit and originality. Some of the images are strange and compelling, to me at least.
Sydney Harbour water certainly brings something to the process that I never considered-- seeing as how many of us here expend so much time and effort trying to keep things clean and under control. Time and the atmosphere are going to degrade our pictures eventually no matter what we do, so why not embrace the corrosion and see where it takes you. Not recommended when working for a client, however.
Appreciate the heads-up, Marc!
Bookmarks