I agree Sergei...an excellent portrait!
I agree Sergei...an excellent portrait!
_______________________________________
http://www.craigtuffin.com
_______________________________________
Scan of a whole plate neg using Agfa Ht-g. Developed in Rodinal 1:120 for 10 mins.
I've exposed and developed to produce higher density for salt prints. I actually like the glowing highlights in this scan but the neg will perform best with an alternative POP (hopefully)
![]()
_______________________________________
http://www.craigtuffin.com
_______________________________________
Nice. One of the things I'm finding particularly easy to make happen with x-ray film is glowing highlights, which I really like.
Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear
how do you choose between blue & green x-ray film?
Generalizations are made because they are Generally true...
There are other differences, but basically blue is mildly orthochromatic, green is more orthochromatic, and Kodak Ektascan is the most orthochromatic of all x-ray films. It is also backed with an anti light-scattering material. It costs twice as much as other x-ray films. Orthochromatic means "all colors", and it looked like it was compared to "ordinary film", but it still couldn't record red. Then came panchromatic film which does record tones of red.
Also... And more importantly
Green = 400ASA
Blue = 100ASA
Half or double is just that, so green half speed is 200ASA
For some reason I'm doubting the Blue speed, it's possible Blue is 200 and Half Speed Blue is 100.... Sorry for the cryptic info, green is definitely 400...
Bookmarks