Looking at Kodak 2D cameras on e-Bay this AM. Ran across a nice one, but it is offered at over 2Grand because it has a '"Low Number". . . .in the 90s I think.
I didn't know that serial numbers were a thing for these cameras.
Comments?
Looking at Kodak 2D cameras on e-Bay this AM. Ran across a nice one, but it is offered at over 2Grand because it has a '"Low Number". . . .in the 90s I think.
I didn't know that serial numbers were a thing for these cameras.
Comments?
Drew Bedo
www.quietlightphoto.com
http://www.artsyhome.com/author/drew-bedo
There are only three types of mounting flanges; too big, too small and wrong thread!
Aim high...
There is long Photrio thread on subject if anyone is curious. Funny.
But I refused to buy Dallmeyer 3D without serial, no fun.
In contento ed allegria
Notte e di vogliam passar!
I'd be more inclined to believe the serial number in question is an assembly sequence number.
I have two 7x11 Eastman No.2's and one is stamped 492 on the back side of the rear standard (directly on the mounting surface of the GG back). The same camera is stamped 23 on the rear face of the rail. My other camera is marked 809 on the body, and 7 on the rear of the rail.
Of the two, I'd be more willing to bet that the three-digit numbers on the rear standard are the serial numbers, assuming the No.2 cameras were serialized at all.
Given that the Kodak 2D cameras superseded the Eastman No.2 series and the seller of the camera in question is basing their claims off of the marking on the rear of the rail, they are sorely mistaken on the camera's historical importance and value. Also, they believe it to be "museum grade" with a missing handle...
Eastman made the 2D for almost 30 years, and there are plenty on the used market, both 5x7 and 8x10. There were a few design changes over that time, but not much of significance.
I would say that value should be tied to condition of the camera more than anything else. Also whether it includes the rail extension and any reduction backs. Barring any damage, they're easy to work on and restore to like-new condition.
Odd sizes like the 6.5x8.5 or 7x11 versions might be more rare, but not as practical in use.
I have both 5x7 and 8x10 and they're great to use, although a bit utilitarian as they lack front swing or tilt.
Now, if you get ahold of Stieglitz's 2D, that'd be worth something!
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/photo_jim/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ag47oldschool/
But..but.. it's on Ebay....it's RARE!
Does anyone restore 2Ds? I have an 8x10 that needs work.
You might try contacting Richard Ritter.
Bookmarks