I like these very much, they are the best I've seen in a while. The somewhat wide view really puts them in your face and the placement and amount of depth of field is just right. Some of the faster or portrait-specialized lenses would just make bland mush where these have worthwhile information and real separation.
They also look really good on screen like you know how to hit a black and white point and where to put the middle. It should be standard practice but here I am commenting because it is still all too rare to do something simple, straight, and well. Kudos.
Would be nice to tickle them for the next shots, they look pretty damn serious ;-p
Thanks Frank, I appreciate you taking the time to comment so thoughtfully. These are part of a LF portrait project I've been doing over the last couple of years. It's beginning to take shape. Portrait photography is not my usual area, but I'm really enjoying the collaborative aspect. All my sitters do seem to end up looking very serious, although on the whole they seem to enjoy the experience. It would be nice to have a couple of more lighthearted pictures. I will work on that :-)
Ian
one i can find easily without having to write it up
http://photo.net/learn/dark_noise/#workflow
Same technique, except you subtract noise from scanner (in this case streaks that repeat from scan to scan) and not from dSLR.
You can use scanning to DNG too, to get it even more close to how its done with dSLR and more "native" (also gives you more flexibility in result processing, IMHO).
Tomas
tomasvysniauskas.com
Corran - np. Hope it works. I know it did for me, when my Epson V500 was giving me trouble in one of channels. Of course then it snuffed it entirely (motor gave up i think )
Anyway. Self portrait, as part of development test sheets (trying to figure out if i like Rodinal or UFG better for rotary development)
4x5 Ilford 400, S-K 150/2.8 @ 2.8 (managed to nail focus!), 1/10
Wee bit of distortion fix after scan.
Self portrait by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
Bookmarks