Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 101

Thread: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

  1. #91

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,457

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pere Casals View Post
    it was brought to still photography by germans
    Yet more perpetuation of the "German" myth. There were several still cameras -- BEFORE WWI -- that used the 1 3/8" movie film developed by Dickson, such as the Tourist Multiple, the Levy-Roth Minnigraph, and the Homeos -- but that was all before my country got into the War.

    So there is a "German" first here -- they created the first World War!

  2. #92

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    Yet more perpetuation of the "German" myth. There were several still cameras -- BEFORE WWI -- that used the 1 3/8" movie film developed by Dickson, such as the Tourist Multiple, the Levy-Roth Minnigraph, and the Homeos -- but that was all before my country got into the War.

    So there is a "German" first here -- they created the first World War!
    The assignation of Crown Prince Ferdinand of The Austro Hungarian Empire, and his wife, was the cause of the start of WW I. That is what brought Germany in on their side of the war.

  3. #93

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,457

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    No offense, but besides learning how to spell assassination, you should read "The Guns of August". There is no need to refight WWI here.

  4. #94

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    No offense, but besides learning how to spell assassination, you should read "The Guns of August". There is no need to refight WWI here.
    Sorry, that was the spell checker.

  5. #95

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    610

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    No offense, but besides learning how to spell assassination, you should read "The Guns of August".
    Or read Solzhenitsyn's three volume epic The Red Wheel for the Russian perspective.

  6. #96
    Tim Meisburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Falls Church, Va.
    Posts
    1,811

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    135mm, of course. 150mm is worthless. Its the generic lens, and your pictures will all look generic, like they were shot on digital. Whereas 135mm has much superior bokeh, and a unique signature similar to a petzval, but better.

    The Fujinons from Japan are very nice, and a good deal.

  7. #97

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    Yet more perpetuation of the "German" myth. There were several still cameras -- BEFORE WWI -- that used the 1 3/8" movie film developed by Dickson, such as the Tourist Multiple, the Levy-Roth Minnigraph, and the Homeos -- but that was all before my country got into the War.

    So there is a "German" first here -- they created the first World War!
    This is true, but Leica refinement/success it was what popularized 35mm film, for this reason it is called 35mm film, and not 1 3/8", the original american designation.


    Leicas liberated photographers from studio and tripod.

    This compactness allowed Robert Cappa to document the Spanish Civil War; Henri Cartier Bresson to capture the lives of The Europeans; and Walker Evans' documentation of the Great Depression.

  8. #98
    Roger Thoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA, Flagstaff AZ
    Posts
    1,609

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    150mm g-claron, very small and light, plenty of coverage. Wouldn't have worry to
    much about focusing at f9, heck two of my best images with mine are nights shots. Just my two cents.

    Roger

  9. #99

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,457

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by pere casals View Post
    this is true, but leica refinement/success it was what popularized 35mm film, for this reason it is called 35mm film, and not 1 3/8", the original american designation.


    Leicas liberated photographers from studio and tripod.

    This compactness allowed robert cappa to document the spanish civil war; henri cartier bresson to capture the lives of the europeans; and walker evans' documentation of the great depression.

    Well said, Pere!!!

  10. #100

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    124

    Re: 135mm or 150mm (4x5) for a first time LF shooter?

    Leica was good for standardization. Kodak liberated us from studio and tripod with their small boxcamera with a roll of film that could take 100 photo's.
    Stupid questions deserve stupid answers.
    allthingsanalogue.weebly.com
    http://www.new55project.com

Similar Threads

  1. 135mm VS 150mm Apo Sironar S
    By seandavid in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2-Jun-2017, 10:21
  2. Modern 135mm-150mm for 5x7?
    By Frank Petronio in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24-Nov-2011, 10:08
  3. 135mm or 150mm?
    By Winger in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 4-Sep-2008, 05:58

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •