post your Architecture photographs!

[RmFrase]

Old Home - Texas
I would have preferred having clouds

Shen-Hao 4x5
90mm NIKKOR
Arista.Edu Ultra - ISO 100
Scanned on Epson V700
Metered with Sekonic L758DR






-Robert

[Donald Miller]

Your photos always have a look to them. Always expertly composed and fantastic tonality. I must be doing something wrong .

Thank you for your generous comment.

[spkennedy3000]

These remind me of a problem I've never resolved for myself: what to do about extraneous elements like streetlights and signs, which inevitably intrude into the edges of my architectural shots. We can sometimes Photoshop them into oblivion in a hybrid process, but that doesn't feel quite legitimate. What is the canonical solution? Just leave them in?

I just leave them in for a job, sometimes they can help a composition:

http://www.simonkennedy.net/Photoblo...e-fin-building

Unless I am asked to remove them...
In my personal work I will stop at nothing!

[Donald Miller]

Balcony - Vigevano, Italy

5X7 - 210 Symmar S

Efke Pl 100 - Pyrocat Hd
JandC Nuance - MAS Amidol

Scanned, post processed and colorized in PS

[Philippe Grunchec]

Donald, instead of using Photoshop you could do a lith print and get the 'same' effect!

[Donald Miller]

Donald, instead of using Photoshop you could do a lith print and get the 'same' effect!

Nope, the rest of the post processing could not have been accomplished with lith printing.

[Andrew O'Neill]

I think it could. Curious to hear why it couldn't.

[Donald Miller]

I think it could. Curious to hear why it couldn't.

To suppose that is to not recognize the myriad possibilities of post processing that may and did in fact take place. Among those were curves adjustments, elimination of keystoning (lens did not have adequate covering power at that composition to eliminate keystoning) among others.

I don't want to get into a digital - film pissing contest and I will not respond to any further attempts to do just that.

[Andrew O'Neill]

Was just curious, that's all.
I too have a few images that could only be fixed in photoshop, and printed out as digital negatives. One image fits this catagory (architecture) and one doesn't. There was serious keystoning with both, and both negatives density ranges were not suitable for carbon transfer printing.

[Sirius Glass]

Was just curious, that's all.
I too have a few images that could only be fixed in photoshop, and printed out as digital negatives. One image fits this catagory (architecture) and one doesn't. There was serious keystoning with both, and both negatives density ranges were not suitable for carbon transfer printing.

Both are perfect the way they are. Neither needs "fixing".

Steve