Lens for 8x10 which would you choose. Keep it under $1000 though.
Curiousity has set in after reading what some were saying about the fujinon 250 w 6.7 lens here.
Lens for 8x10 which would you choose. Keep it under $1000 though.
Curiousity has set in after reading what some were saying about the fujinon 250 w 6.7 lens here.
355/9 G-Claron.
Nikon/Nikkor f9 300M.
12" Goerz American Optical Dagor.
Regarding the 250 6,7 Fuji....that is my preferred--my second being my 210 Fuji--for mild/moderate wides and general use
As much as I am liking my new-to-me Fuji W 250/6.7, I would stick with my Fuji W 300/5.6 if I had to choose. I have found the 300 to be a good all-around focal length for my photography.
However, if I went with a light-weight 8x10 instead of my Zone VI (maybe a camera with a single extension -- perhaps non-folding), the 250/6.7 would be a contender. A lot less glass and perhaps it could stay on the camera while walking around.
Normal lens. I currently have a Rodenstock Sironar S. However, I also had a Nikon 300M, which was exactly just as good. The other lens would be a Dagor....
Lenny
EigerStudios
Museum Quality Drum Scanning and Printing
Fuji 360A - though getting one under a K takes some patience, but can be done.
14-inch commercial ektar
Bookmarks