Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

  1. #31

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR USA
    Posts
    747

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    90, 150, 210 for 4x5.
    120, 210, 300 for whole plate.
    It's funny, I primarily use normal-to-long lenses for 4x5, but wide-to-normal lenses more often on WP.

    Peter Gomena

  2. #32
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,617

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    i have a 65 90 210 for 4x5. i also have a 121 SA but i use it on my 8x10. my 8x10 trio consist of 121, 300, 480. Im looking for something around 175 that will cover 8x10, the 121 is a bit too wide.
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  3. #33

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    Shooting 8x10, my latest acquisition is a Schneider 90 XL. Covers 4x10 beautifully.
    Next is the Schneider 150XL, then a Rodenstock 210n. The Nikkor 300 has hardly been touched and the Fuji 450 hasn't made it out of the bag, yet.
    Horses for courses...

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    775

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    If I could have only three they would be 120, 150, 210. I use these three for virtually all of my work anyway, once in a while I use my 90mm.

    But I'm not a wideangle fan. In your case a 135mm or 150mm would fit in great between the lenses you already have.

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    currently Boulder, CO; formerly Seattle, WA.
    Posts
    210

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    Hmmmm....if I was building an all around kit for 4x5, I would probably keep my 120, 150, and 210.....but honestly my most used lenses on 4x5 (in order of use) are 150, 300, 450...though this might be a long lens phase I was going through, I havent decided yet.

    However, if I had to pick only 3 lenses to use for 4x5 AND 8x10 I think a 150 (4x5 only), 300, and 450 would be a good lineup for me. I know that was not the OP's question....
    ----------------------
    http://adamsatushek.com

  6. #36
    uphereinmytree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    pittsburgh pa.
    Posts
    230

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    I use a 125mm fuji, a 240mm xenar or a 220mm verito , and a 450mm nikkor on 4x5. Sometimes you can't move closer and I don't shoot alot of landscapes where really wide is best. This would be ideal for me if allowed only 3 lenses as my back has been recently, but who has only 3 lenses?

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    526

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    For a long time my three lens kit for 4x5 landscapes was 75/125/210.
    Never is always wrong; always is never right.

    www.LostManPhoto.com
    www.MarkStahlkePhotography.com

  8. #38
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,614
    I lived for years with 90 and 121mm Super Angulons and a 8-1/2" Ilex. Recently as used lenses have gotten cheap, I've added a 65, replaced the Ilex with a 210 Sironar, and added a 300. (I have others, too--150, 180, and 240, but I only use them in special cases.) I could still be happy with 90, 121, and 210, though.

    Rick "who rarely notices the gap between 121 and 210" Dennet

  9. #39
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,399

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    That's how I generally do it anyway. For 8x10: 250,360,450.

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    40

    Re: If you could have only three lens focal lengths?

    I lean toward the moderately wide-angle part of the spectrum. On the 8x10 it’s mostly the 10” and sometimes the 12” convertible (19” + 23½”). I guess that makes four.

    On the 5x7 it’s almost exclusively the 16.5cm. But I sometimes use a 210mm Reproclaron for fruits and vegetables.

    I guess I'm too comfortable in my photographic rut!

Similar Threads

  1. 240 mm f5.6 focal lengths unavailable in copal 0
    By jgsnel in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 27-Feb-2011, 05:44
  2. About '35mm equivalent' focal lengths
    By BetterSense in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 29-Apr-2010, 09:59
  3. Favored Focal Lengths
    By dazedgonebye in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2008, 15:21
  4. Converting large format lens focal lengths
    By Kraemer in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2005, 07:54
  5. Focal Lengths?
    By Mark_3705 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17-Jul-2004, 09:13

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •