Originally Posted by
bglick
> In fact you know what? why don't you put your money where your mouth is.
Money has germs, so I never put it where my mouth is.....
> You say stitching is better than ULF,
Well, it can be, assuming the subject is static....
> well, why don't you make a 12x20 print, I will make a contact print and we send them to any one in this forum you choose and we will see which one is better.
Well, I use film Jorge, so I would not be the right person to propose this challenge. (I only mentioned this about 20x) But you may want to run this by Max Lyon, he makes 1 + Gigapixel images by stitching hundreds of small 8MP images together. Visit his web site, and throw the challenge out there, I am sure he will be eager to work with you..... you seem fair and level headed, give it a go! Keep us posted!
> I have issued this challenge to those using digital many times...no takers so far, will you be the first one?
If I shot digital, I would be happy to oblige Jorge, but I shoot film. But if you want some of my family 6MP digicam shots, (I assume they are the ones you refer to) I would be glad to send you some, then you can compare them against your 16x20 B&W landscape images. That's the best I can do..... cause it sounds like you're eager to demonstrate your point. I think it would be a fair comparison to prove your point, would you agree? Let the cards fall where they may.... as you say, the proof is in the pudding, and so far, no one has made puddin as good as yours... I will be the first to admit, the scans you posted demonstrated all I need to see. I am out-matched technically and aesthetically.
Bookmarks