So many formulas and so little time. What the heck - I'll try it later today.
Any suggestions on the amount of EDTA to add. I've added EDTA to my PMK as per Hutchings as I use BTZS tubes.
From memory his suggestion is about 5 gms/litre
Steve
So many formulas and so little time. What the heck - I'll try it later today.
Any suggestions on the amount of EDTA to add. I've added EDTA to my PMK as per Hutchings as I use BTZS tubes.
From memory his suggestion is about 5 gms/litre
Steve
I have heard a lot on this board that I agree with and a lot that I disagree with. This is one of those that I disagree with. I have been using PMK in the JOBO with my 4x5, 5x7, 4x10 and 8x10 negatives for over 3 years now and I have to say that I have NEVER had better negatives. HP5+ in all formats.
And you prefer PMK to both, with rotary processing?
That's interesting. How are you printing?
Printing GSP's, PT/PD, cyanotypes and VDB's. Also scanning and doing inkjet prints.
Wow! The full gamut! I'm not sure why Rollo Pyro or Max Pyro gave you negatives of lower quality than PMK -- I would expect either to at least equal PMK in rotary processing. The problem, and it's well documented, with PMK in rotary processing is that it produces excessive general stain. Excessive is a relative term, but in this case it's relative to other staining developers designed to be used in rotary processing. There's any number of reasons you might not see this as a problem, but that shouldn't be taken to mean the developer somehow works differently for you than it does for other people, although that is one possibility. The good news is that you're happy with your results, so there's not really any good reason to worry about others' experiences or results.
Bookmarks