Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    763

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    So many formulas and so little time. What the heck - I'll try it later today.
    Any suggestions on the amount of EDTA to add. I've added EDTA to my PMK as per Hutchings as I use BTZS tubes.

    From memory his suggestion is about 5 gms/litre

    Steve

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Nicholls View Post
    So many formulas and so little time. What the heck - I'll try it later today.
    Any suggestions on the amount of EDTA to add. I've added EDTA to my PMK as per Hutchings as I use BTZS tubes.

    From memory his suggestion is about 5 gms/litre

    Steve
    Steve,

    I've never used EDTA, and I think if you use distilled water for the stock solution it isn't necessary, but if you'd like to add some, I'd try about 0.2g, to keep with the concentration recommended for PMK.

  3. #23
    Analog Photographer Kimberly Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    658

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew O'Neill View Post
    Mike, PMK is not good for rotary processing. The PMK version for that is Rollo-Pyro. Pyrocat-HD will work fine for both rotary and tray... and you don't need Triethanolamine.
    I have heard a lot on this board that I agree with and a lot that I disagree with. This is one of those that I disagree with. I have been using PMK in the JOBO with my 4x5, 5x7, 4x10 and 8x10 negatives for over 3 years now and I have to say that I have NEVER had better negatives. HP5+ in all formats.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by michael slade View Post
    I have heard a lot on this board that I agree with and a lot that I disagree with. This is one of those that I disagree with. I have been using PMK in the JOBO with my 4x5, 5x7, 4x10 and 8x10 negatives for over 3 years now and I have to say that I have NEVER had better negatives. HP5+ in all formats.
    Michael,

    What other staining developers have you tried?

  5. #25
    Analog Photographer Kimberly Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    658

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    MaxPyro and Rollo Pyro.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    And you prefer PMK to both, with rotary processing?

  7. #27
    Analog Photographer Kimberly Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    658

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Yeah.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    That's interesting. How are you printing?

  9. #29
    Analog Photographer Kimberly Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    658

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Printing GSP's, PT/PD, cyanotypes and VDB's. Also scanning and doing inkjet prints.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: WD2D+ & BTZS Tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by michael slade View Post
    Printing GSP's, PT/PD, cyanotypes and VDB's. Also scanning and doing inkjet prints.
    Wow! The full gamut! I'm not sure why Rollo Pyro or Max Pyro gave you negatives of lower quality than PMK -- I would expect either to at least equal PMK in rotary processing. The problem, and it's well documented, with PMK in rotary processing is that it produces excessive general stain. Excessive is a relative term, but in this case it's relative to other staining developers designed to be used in rotary processing. There's any number of reasons you might not see this as a problem, but that shouldn't be taken to mean the developer somehow works differently for you than it does for other people, although that is one possibility. The good news is that you're happy with your results, so there's not really any good reason to worry about others' experiences or results.

Similar Threads

  1. BTZS Tubes?
    By healyzh in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 16-Jan-2010, 23:39
  2. Btzs Tubes
    By seawolf66 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 7-Jan-2008, 16:28
  3. PMK, BTZS tubes and HP5
    By Shen45 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21-Nov-2006, 19:09

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •