Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: um....? weirdness in this new negative

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    May we se a scan of the neg?

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    Even with this tiny cropped image it still looks like double exposure to me. Some areas covering the child lighten values and others darken them.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.png 
Views:	45 
Size:	148.4 KB 
ID:	72511

  3. #13
    SpeedGraphicMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    308

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    It is possible that the film had recieved a "light leak" while it was in storage.
    I.E. through its original box and bag.

    Don't look a gift horse in the puss.
    "I would like to see Paris before I die... Philadelphia will do..."

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    SGM... My posts are just my perceptions of what "I think" I see in the image. I never intended for my posts to be viewed as accusatory toward whomever supplied the film. Maybe it's my lousy use of written English language. Mistakes happen to everyone.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    25

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    I also go for intentional or unintentional (e.g. pinhole in bellows) double exposure. The pattern seems too regular to be cause by film degeneration. Is the film IR sensitive? In my IR days, I have seen some strange pinhole effects through light leaks caused by removing or inserting the dark slide, even things resembling an image.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    Pinholed bellows, or a hole in the lensboard somewhere.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  7. #17
    new girl jessicadittmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    69

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    I haven't had trouble with other images but this film holder arrived pre-loaded for me- so the first time I've used this holder in the camera. My other images are all great so I don't think it is a problem in the camera. Could be the film holder (they are wooden- I suppose it happens).It's very odd looking either way. I may have to test that film holder again to see- can use paper and see what happens too. It does look double exposure-like since it is within the image and film as the other areas like my son are. it is the aerial ilford film - it was on a roll so he cuts it and loads it that way. Very thin film - different. I'll test and take notes so I can keep track if I have a problem holder- may have a side I can't use we shall see.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR USA
    Posts
    747

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    If you have old wooden holders, they can become warped over time. The flashlight test will show gaps between the holders and the camera back. Bellows or lens board pinholes can be hard to see. Again, try the flashlight test.

    Peter Gomena

  9. #19
    new girl jessicadittmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    69

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    thanks! Just take it into the dark and use the light or will it show in reg. or dim light?

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR USA
    Posts
    747

    Re: um....? weirdness in this new negative

    A totally dark room is not necessary. Just dark enough for the flashlight to show well will do the job. For the lens board test, put the lens on with shutter closed and take the back off the camera and shine the light in through the back. Look around the lens board where it fits the camera. For the bellows and camera back, extend the bellows to its maximum, take the lens board off and put a film holder in the back, shine the light in the front end. The corners of bellows tend to develop pinholes, the peaks and valleys of the bellows tend to wear thin on old cameras. Old film holders can warp, so look around where it fits snugly against the back. Search this segment of the forum for remedies for leaky bellows - it's a common topic.

    Peter Gomena

Similar Threads

  1. Epson 3800 magenta ink clog ...and other weirdness
    By Susan Scott in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 2-Jan-2021, 20:02
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2-May-2011, 12:25
  3. does a color negative have the same dynamic range as a regular b&w film negative?
    By dede95064 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 20-Jan-2010, 10:40
  4. Clyde Butcher - Scanning a Negative as a Negative.
    By Duane Polcou in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2010, 16:16
  5. is a good negative for contact printing also a good negative for enlarging?
    By BetterSense in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 17-Sep-2009, 22:15

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •