Page 17 of 26 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 254

Thread: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

  1. #161
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    I think nothing looks better than a wet print -- then the dang things dry.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    Come on now Vaughan, except when it dries to be one of Thomas Joshua Coopers prints 3 million shades of dark grey and black

    Ian

  2. #162
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    I love Cooper's prints-he was graduate student when I was an undergraduate at UNM. i used to go to his critiques. VD Coke used to jack him up "photography doesn't need a third generation of b&w landscape photographers". Cooper just kept his mouth shut and did his thing.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  3. #163
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    I think nothing looks better than a wet print -- then the dang things dry.

    Yep... but what doesn't look too far off is a gloss laminated ink-jet. It has that "sparkle" too....
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  4. #164

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    MY dad's inkjet can out-gloss your dad's inkjet.

  5. #165

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    I love Cooper's prints-he was graduate student when I was an undergraduate at UNM. i used to go to his critiques. VD Coke used to jack him up "photography doesn't need a third generation of b&w landscape photographers". Cooper just kept his mouth shut and did his thing.
    I'm not sure I'd agree with Coke outright, but I feel photography doesn't need another 1st or second generation of B&W landscape photographers.

  6. #166

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pittsfield, MA
    Posts
    784

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    Some of you may not have been around long enough to actually experience the fight for recognition of photography as an art form. It was still going strong (though waining) when I was an undergraduate at UNM in the 60's studying with Beaumont Newhall and Van Deuron Coke et al. The exact same arguments expressed now about digital processes were then aimed at analogue photography by painters, stone lithographers etc.-"Photography is not art. It is machine made" I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard that in my youth. Fortunately that ship sailed along time ago and fell off the edge of the known flat world.
    Sadly, it's still going on, the dept. chair at my school (a painter), doesn't consider photography a valid art form. The better you become at your art, both aesthetically and technically, and the less respect he has. So much so that I failed my BFA review solely based on my chosen media being photography. I don't care about a BA vs. a BFA, but the attitude is still prevalent among many.

  7. #167
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,398

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    Actually, I think photography would benefit if the word "art" was completely erased from our vocabulary. That way idiots could spend their
    money just because they are idiots, with no esthetic justification whatsoever; and "art critics" would have to find legitimate jobs like delivering pizzas. But oh, we'd sure miss all the memorable food fights
    the expression inevitably generates. And now we have ink as well as gelatin to toss!

  8. #168
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    interesting video on TJC



    -Dan

  9. #169

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southland, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,082

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    That was good. I wonder where he went to make the black ones?

  10. #170
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Isle of Wight, near England
    Posts
    707

    Re: Inkjet better than wet prints yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Actually, I think photography would benefit if the word "art" was completely erased from our vocabulary.
    It would also be good if people stopped confusing art with the medium/craft used to create it.

    e.g. Photography is not art but some photographs are. Painting is not art but some paintings are.


    Steve.

Similar Threads

  1. Laminating inkjet prints?
    By David Curtis in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-Aug-2011, 11:31
  2. Making inkjet prints from enlarger prints
    By coops in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2009, 07:07
  3. should inkjet prints be dry mounted?
    By robc in forum Business
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 22-Dec-2005, 21:33
  4. Coatings for Inkjet Prints
    By David Luttmann in forum Business
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-May-2005, 08:01
  5. Dry Mounting inkjet prints
    By Ed Eubanks in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-Aug-2004, 20:48

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •