Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Scanner

  1. #11

    Scanner

    Jay: The 3200 did not turn out to be the quantum jump from the 2450 that the marketing hyped resolution numbers promised, so it may be naive to think the 4800 will be better, -no matter how much pre-conditioned salivating goes on from those easily tantalized by hype. The LF flatbed scanner market really needs a quantum jump and if it comes, my guess is that it will be in a different form that the conventional flat bed. The Microtek i900 could be that, who knows? At least it offers glassless transparency scanning and 'promises' higher Dmax (4.2) than current or announced scanners. Whether that is true it remains to be seen. I'd wait until the cards are up before deciding. You can see the Microtek at http://www.microtekusa.com/images/i900.pdf

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Scanner

    Thanks, Julio. The chances that I'll be in the market for another scanner anytime soon are infintessimal, but I'm curious about the Microtek anyway. Jay

Similar Threads

  1. Scanner comparison: Epson 4990 scanner added
    By Leigh Perry in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 28-Aug-2006, 05:35
  2. scanner
    By Veríssimo Dias in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2005, 15:13
  3. 4x5 scanner under $200?
    By LP in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22-Jun-2004, 05:42
  4. Scanner
    By Yves Gauvreau in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4-Jun-2004, 20:49
  5. 4x5 neg scanner
    By james norman in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6-Apr-2000, 00:37

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •