I am just wondering
Why are lenses never mesured in quare formats.
We always talk about lenses suitable for 4 x 5, 8 x 10, etc.
But they actually cover 5 x 5 or 10 x 10.
Alex
I am just wondering
Why are lenses never mesured in quare formats.
We always talk about lenses suitable for 4 x 5, 8 x 10, etc.
But they actually cover 5 x 5 or 10 x 10.
Alex
"You dont take a picture, it's given to you"
www.alextimmermans.com
www.collodion-art.blogspot.com
email : collodion-art dot onsmail dot nl
First...
Because they're defined in terms of common film formats... 4x5 is... 5x5 is not.
Second...
A lens that covers 4x5 might not cover 5x5, since the diagonal of 5x5 is larger than that of 4x5.
Lenses for some medium format cameras, particularly Hasselblad, are measured for square format (6x6).
- Leigh
If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.
Just for fun, I drew it out. A circle for 5x5 is about 7" and for 4x5 is about 6 3/8" in diameter.
Film dimensions are a bit smaller than stated size, but close enough.
If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.
ic-racer,
How about Hasselblads and Rollie TLR's?
They are 6x6 square formats.
This is the Large Format Forum
Non-Large Format lenses are usually not listed with any coverage specification. Exceptions I know are some shift lenses and the Zeiss Luminars (which give a non-format-specified angle of view for each lens)
OT: Another good reason why the Horseman 6x9 is a Large Format Camera: Not only do the lenses all have a published "coverage" specification, they display the image circle right on the lens barrel of each lens!
Bookmarks