Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Alex Timmermans
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    589

    Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    I am just wondering
    Why are lenses never mesured in quare formats.
    We always talk about lenses suitable for 4 x 5, 8 x 10, etc.
    But they actually cover 5 x 5 or 10 x 10.


    Alex
    "You dont take a picture, it's given to you"

    www.alextimmermans.com
    www.collodion-art.blogspot.com
    email : collodion-art dot onsmail dot nl

  2. #2
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    First...
    Because they're defined in terms of common film formats... 4x5 is... 5x5 is not.

    Second...
    A lens that covers 4x5 might not cover 5x5, since the diagonal of 5x5 is larger than that of 4x5.

    Lenses for some medium format cameras, particularly Hasselblad, are measured for square format (6x6).

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by alex from holland View Post
    I am just wondering
    Why are lenses never mesured in quare formats.
    We always talk about lenses suitable for 4 x 5, 8 x 10, etc.
    But they actually cover 5 x 5 or 10 x 10.


    Alex

    Actually, lens cover a circle, not a square format.

    Sandy
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at groups.io
    [url]https://groups.io/g/carbon

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,015

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sanking View Post
    Actually, lens cover a circle, not a square format.

    Sandy
    snap!

  5. #5
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Just for fun, I drew it out. A circle for 5x5 is about 7" and for 4x5 is about 6 3/8" in diameter.

    Film dimensions are a bit smaller than stated size, but close enough.

  6. #6
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    Just for fun, I drew it out. A circle for 5x5 is about 7" and for 4x5 is about 6 3/8" in diameter.
    How about basic trigonometry?

    Diagonal = sqrt( a^2 + b^2 )

    5^2 + 5^2 = 25 + 25 = 50; sqrt( 50 ) = 7.071

    4^2 + 5^2 = 16 + 25 = 41; sqrt( 41 ) = 6.403

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    How about basic trigonometry?

    Diagonal = sqrt( a^2 + b^2 )

    5^2 + 5^2 = 25 + 25 = 50; sqrt( 50 ) = 7.071

    4^2 + 5^2 = 16 + 25 = 41; sqrt( 41 ) = 6.403

    - Leigh
    How about just multiplying the length of a side of a square by 1.414 (sqrt2) ? (Winking smiley)
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  8. #8
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,532

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    ic-racer,

    How about Hasselblads and Rollie TLR's?

    They are 6x6 square formats.

  9. #9
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,763

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gem Singer View Post
    ic-racer,

    How about Hasselblads and Rollie TLR's?

    They are 6x6 square formats.
    This is the Large Format Forum

    Non-Large Format lenses are usually not listed with any coverage specification. Exceptions I know are some shift lenses and the Zeiss Luminars (which give a non-format-specified angle of view for each lens)

    OT: Another good reason why the Horseman 6x9 is a Large Format Camera: Not only do the lenses all have a published "coverage" specification, they display the image circle right on the lens barrel of each lens!

  10. #10
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Why are lenses never measured in square format ?

    Quote Originally Posted by E. von Hoegh View Post
    How about just multiplying the length of a side of a square by 1.414 (sqrt2) ? (Winking smiley)
    That works for a square (a = b), but not for a rectangle (a <> b).

    I used the formula appropriate for the general case. (frownie)

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

Similar Threads

  1. square image-square frame?
    By Eric Brody in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2013, 22:38
  2. Square Format with a 4x5 View Camera
    By KyledeC in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 16-Nov-2011, 09:35
  3. The Square Format
    By Richard A Johnson in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 7-Mar-2011, 07:15
  4. Square Large Format Images ?
    By Ken Lee in forum On Photography
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 15-Nov-2008, 12:44
  5. Epson 2450 measured against later models
    By Duane Polcou in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-May-2007, 16:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •