Don, I have a 1982 Nikon catalog that lists a 100/5.6 W and a 105/3.5 M. The 100 is a plasmat type, claimed coverage at f/22 is 153 mm. The 105 is a tessar type, claimed coverage at f/22 is 110 mm, and the catalog asserts that all Nikkor-Ms (105/3.5, 300/9, 450/9) are apochromats.
You may have confused two quite different lenses.
I downloaded 1982 and 2002-4 Nikon LF lenses catalogs from http://savazzi.freehostia.com/photog...literature.htm . The 105/3.5 M isn't in the 2002-4 catalog, the 200/8 M that's in it isn't in the 1982 catalog.
Bookmarks