Page 18 of 23 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 226

Thread: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

  1. #171
    A.K.A Lucky Bloke ;-)
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL, USA
    Posts
    660

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    I buy most of the chemicals at Artcraft Chemicals. How much did you pay for 250g of catechol from Poland?

  2. #172

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    493

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    I paid €70.00 for 1 kilo in 2012 so I was wrong to imagine there was a BIG saving as that works out at $23.71 per 250g. My apologies.

    RR

  3. #173
    A.K.A Lucky Bloke ;-)
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL, USA
    Posts
    660

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    No apologies needed. It's always good to discuss about sources and cost for chemicals.

  4. #174

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    Quote Originally Posted by Dakotah Jackson View Post
    Have never mixed Pyrocat HD with anything but water. Very simple and inexpensive as well.

    If the difference is not anything that I can actually see in the final prints - why change?

    Add in that Sandy King is a good guy and I'll stick with it.
    Times two on all counts. Sandy is and has always been a distinguished dignitary academically and within the photographic community. They don't come any better.

  5. #175
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,150

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    Ken, I dry-mount scanned the negatives with a V750. Full negatives at 600dpi. 48bit colour. For the smaller samples I scanned in at 4800dpi. I kept the green channel and eliminated red and blue channels in PS. No sharpening.

    Personally, I like pyrocat-hd and OA and will use them both.

  6. #176

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    262

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    If it's as good as the name you picked for it, I'll have to try it! Maybe you should be
    in marketing!
    Indeed. Marketing.

  7. #177

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    493

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    Quote Originally Posted by C_Remington View Post
    Indeed. Marketing.
    I don't understand this attempt at cynicism. No one is being forced to even read about OBSIDIAN AQUA let alone make it and use it. An attractive aspect of OBSIDIAN AQUA is that it is being used purely on its merits. There is no marketing, nothing is for sale. The formula has been given by its inventor, free, gratis and for nowt, to us all. It is published in the public domain for all to see, consider and, if so minded, to make and use. It is a very useful developer.

    RR

  8. #178

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    667

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    Quote Originally Posted by C_Remington View Post
    Indeed. Marketing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Regular Rod View Post
    I don't understand this attempt at cynicism. No one is being forced to even read about OBSIDIAN AQUA let alone make it and use it. An attractive aspect of OBSIDIAN AQUA is that it is being used purely on its merits. There is no marketing, nothing is for sale. The formula has been given by its inventor, free, gratis and for nowt, to us all. It is published in the public domain for all to see, consider and, if so minded, to make and use. It is a very useful developer. RR
    ____

    Rod, agreed in full 110%
    --
    I think that some people are unable to accept, that Obsidian Aqua and/or the latest version of Hypercat are just as good... If not Perhaps? even slightly better (*On some individual counts) -- Than Pyrocat-HD.
    --
    Best Regards,

    -Tim.

    ________

  9. #179

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    For those of you who prefer to use rotary processing (Jobo) and are okay with a slight reduction to box speed, what length of time at what temperature do you for specific films? I use only Delta 100 and T-max 400 (4 x 5). And aside from the loss of box speed, are the results any different than processing semi-stand?

  10. #180
    A.K.A Lucky Bloke ;-)
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL, USA
    Posts
    660

    Re: Obsidian Aqua, catechol staining developer

    The oxidation of the developer is directly linked to the agitation which depends of the speed and design of the tanks in the Jobos. Also, the amount and/or concentration of developer solution needs to be considered, so allow me to suggest using 2:2:100 instead of the regular 1:1:100 and start your tests on the 5 min mark.

Similar Threads

  1. Ideal Developer for Film to be Scanned
    By Jay DeFehr in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 19-May-2017, 15:25
  2. pyro developer, but which?
    By sergiob in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 211
    Last Post: 27-Oct-2014, 22:30
  3. Glycin and staining developers
    By Jarin Blaschke in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 3-Aug-2012, 04:50
  4. Which staining developer?
    By Leonard Metcalf in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 21-Oct-2007, 08:13
  5. Old Formulas : Film
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19-Mar-2005, 21:31

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •