Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

  1. #11
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    John,

    if you're referring to Fuji, then yes. No 8x10 FUJI color negative at B+H.

    However, their website is showing KODAK Portra 400 AND 160 in stock currently.

    -Dan

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,176

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Quote Originally Posted by DanielStone View Post
    John,

    if you're referring to Fuji, then yes. No 8x10 FUJI color negative at B+H.

    However, their website is showing KODAK Portra 400 AND 160 in stock currently.

    -Dan
    Yes, the post was in response to another about no one else (but Kodak) making color film. I shoot E100G and (now) Portra 400 in 8x10 for color. So, I will sorely miss Kodak color slide and NEG if it goes away.

  3. #13
    moltogordo
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Prince George BC
    Posts
    85

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Sad. I'm glad that D76 and Dektol formulas are published. But what'll we do without Tri-X? Especially in (horrors) 35mm?

  4. #14

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    "Bankrupt" doesn't necessarily mean "out of business", of course.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin M Bourque View Post
    "Bankrupt" doesn't necessarily mean "out of business", of course.
    A certainly not when the annual sales are over 7 billion.
    The question is only what emerges from the restructuring.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,176

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Allen in Montreal View Post
    A certainly not when the annual sales are over 7 billion.
    The question is only what emerges from the restructuring.
    That is operating revenue. Net income was negative three quarters of a billion. Three years of substantially growing losses. If you are in that situation, you are in trouble no matter what your gross is.

    But yes, bankruptcy doesn't mean out of business.

  7. #17

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Quote Originally Posted by moltogordo View Post
    Sad. I'm glad that D76 and Dektol formulas are published. But what'll we do without Tri-X? Especially in (horrors) 35mm?
    Ilford HP5 is a superb emulsion in 35mm.

  8. #18
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Luttmann View Post
    Ilford HP5 is a superb emulsion in 35mm.
    It is, I just don't want to lose my Tri-X/Diafine combination. It's a good 2/3s to 1 stop usable speed faster than HP5 in Diafine, and that makes a difference. I never go to TMZ until I need 3200.

    But, not a deal breaker. I can always use a larger negative to make up for more grain in tiny sizes, especially at today's medium format prices. Delta 3200 is nice in MF when you need "available darkness."

  9. #19

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    Agreed Roger. For me, it HP5 in HC110 Dil B....for iso 650.

  10. #20
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Kodak might file Bankruptcy.

    I've hashed it out before and took some flak for suggesting that if TMY-2 goes away Ilford will probably produce Delta 400 in sheets again (they were rumored to be considering it after Kodak canceled TMY-2 in sizes larger than 4x5) but the facts boil down to this: in black and white there are a few Kodak products I'd miss, but nothing catastrophic. My black and white life would need some slight adjustment but would pretty much go on unaffected. Color is a very different thing.

    Of course, Kodak filing bankruptcy is a long way from their products all going away. The ideal solution of someone buying off the film/analog side of the business could be rosy, if unlikely. Heck, while I'm pipe dreaming, maybe someone will do that and bring back Kodachrome! In 120! Heck, in sheets! Type R paper!

    [and then I woke up]

Similar Threads

  1. Some Kodak Readyloads to be discontinued
    By Juergen Sattler in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2008, 17:02
  2. Doesn't Kodak want to sell 8x10 Tri-X anymore?
    By Wayne Lambert in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 2-Sep-2008, 15:44
  3. Kodak Discontinuing B&W Paper?
    By Paddy Quinn in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 3-Apr-2006, 18:49
  4. Old Formulas : Toners
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2-Apr-2005, 09:35

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •