Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: IT8 targets

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    573

    IT8 targets

    I would like to start using IT8 targets.

    They do not seem to be so widely available any more. And they prices vary widely. What do people think of the lower priced ones? I know you get what you pay for, but I am not going to pay more than I paid for my scanner!

  2. #2
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,979

    Re: IT8 targets

    I have Wolf Faust's targets. They work well for me.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    526

    Re: IT8 targets

    Another vote for Wolf Faust's targets.
    Never is always wrong; always is never right.

    www.LostManPhoto.com
    www.MarkStahlkePhotography.com

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    573

    Re: IT8 targets

    How many IT8 targets do you find it necessary to have?

    I have shot mostly E-6, both Fuji and Kodak. I also have a very small number of Kodachromes.

    Is it really helpful to have a target for each Fuji film (Sensia, Provia etc.)?

  5. #5
    Joanna Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Plestin-les-Grèves, France
    Posts
    989

    Re: IT8 targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Rider View Post
    How many IT8 targets do you find it necessary to have?

    I have shot mostly E-6, both Fuji and Kodak. I also have a very small number of Kodachromes.

    Is it really helpful to have a target for each Fuji film (Sensia, Provia etc.)?
    There are definitely differences in the targets and I find if I were to use a profile generated from a different film that the colours are not as true as with the profile from the appropriate target.
    Joanna Carter
    Grandes Images

    UKLFPG

  6. #6
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,979

    Re: IT8 targets

    S1 is a pretty good deal for $80.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    573
    Peter, S1 is good for 35mm. Can I use it for LF as well?

  8. #8
    Joanna Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Plestin-les-Grèves, France
    Posts
    989

    Re: IT8 targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Rider View Post
    Peter, S1 is good for 35mm. Can I use it for LF as well?
    IMHO, the smaller targets are on a different film base; better to stick with the 4x5 sizes
    Joanna Carter
    Grandes Images

    UKLFPG

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    573

    Re: IT8 targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Joanna Carter View Post
    IMHO, the smaller targets are on a different film base; better to stick with the 4x5 sizes
    That is true, I had not thought of that. On the other hand, I am using an Epson 4990 flatbed, not an Imacon. So I have to weigh how much of an impact the profile will make.

    Assuming the 35mm targets are not optimal for 4x5, do you think (or just guess) that they will make matters worse or just not [a lot] better?

  10. #10
    Joanna Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Plestin-les-Grèves, France
    Posts
    989

    Re: IT8 targets

    Quote Originally Posted by Rider View Post
    That is true, I had not thought of that. On the other hand, I am using an Epson 4990 flatbed, not an Imacon. So I have to weigh how much of an impact the profile will make.

    Assuming the 35mm targets are not optimal for 4x5, do you think (or just guess) that they will make matters worse or just not [a lot] better?
    I know they cost more in 4x5 but they are individually measured rather than a bulk job.

    Personally, I think, with the very small patch size of the smaller neg, you could get spillover between patches. Again, personally, I went for the 4x5 and am very happy with them
    Joanna Carter
    Grandes Images

    UKLFPG

Similar Threads

  1. Eversmart vs drum scanners & Aztek plateau
    By 8x10 user in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2023, 20:14
  2. New IT8 target for my V750
    By Harley Goldman in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 23-Aug-2009, 15:08
  3. Top-end digital concerns
    By Clement Apffel in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2009, 16:34
  4. V750 includes transparent calibration targets?
    By walter23 in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-Jan-2007, 15:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •