Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    117

    Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Hi All,

    Background:
    I'm wanting to shoot people's eyes. In fact, really just one eye, as closely cropped around the iris as possible and would like to enlarge these images as large as possible. Ideally as large as 40" x 40".

    I understand that both the 120mm and 180mm are capable of 2:1 magnification. If the eye is approximately 1.5" square, that would give me a 3" x 3" image on the film at 2:1.


    Questions:
    1- How much bellows extension do you need for each lens at 2:1. I have a Sinar P2 and plan to get a Linhof MT3000.

    2- Does image quality suffer as one goes from 1:1 to a greater magnification of 2:1?

    Thanks,
    David

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    120 has a FFL of 235.6 so 2:1 is 942mm of extension (37.1")
    180mm is 356.5 so 2:1 is 1426mm of extension. (56.1")

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Ind.
    Posts
    590

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    I get 475mm for the 120 and 717mm for the 180.

    2:1 implies 3x FL + (FFL-FL).

    Bob seems to have used 4x FFL

  4. #4

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Think about lighting.
    That's gonna be tough.

    Might try it first with whatever lens you have now.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Quote Originally Posted by aduncanson View Post
    I get 475mm for the 120 and 717mm for the 180.

    2:1 implies 3x FL + (FFL-FL).

    Bob seems to have used 4x FFL
    Thanks,

    I should answer this type of question later in the day.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,015

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    awesome Nick Nixon picture of his eye was up at the MFA in Boston and maybe still is. There's skin in the picture but mostly I think it's just his eye. The guy has his sh1t down. I believe it's an 8x10 contact print.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,654

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Quote Originally Posted by sully75 View Post
    awesome Nick Nixon picture of his eye was up at the MFA in Boston and maybe still is. There's skin in the picture but mostly I think it's just his eye. The guy has his sh1t down. I believe it's an 8x10 contact print.
    The show closed the other day, after a run of many months.

    I think it was an 11x14. The eye was nowhere near filling the picture, but even so it was a tour de force. I couldn't look at it without wondering how he pulled it off - or how many sheets he needed to pull it off.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    291

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Keep in mind that 717mm is almost 29 inches and 475mm is 19 inches. Thats a lot of bellows extension. I have a Nikkor AM ED 120mm Macro and one of the reasons I like the lens is the shorter bellows draw it requires. I shoot on a Sinar so it's always easy to add more bellows but does make shooting a little more complicated when you are working around a camera rig that is almost 3 feet long.

    Don't forget to calculate for bellows extension.

    -Joshua

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    117

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Thanks, everyone for all the great information.

    David

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,015

    Re: Rodenstock Apo-Macro-Sironar 120mm f/5.6 vs. 180mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Oren Grad View Post
    The show closed the other day, after a run of many months.

    I think it was an 11x14. The eye was nowhere near filling the picture, but even so it was a tour de force. I couldn't look at it without wondering how he pulled it off - or how many sheets he needed to pull it off.
    From what I remember, it looked like there was one softbox, from above. How he nailed the focus I don't know. Maybe just a ton of light so he could stop down enough to get a bit more DOF?

Similar Threads

  1. Rodenstock 210 mm Apo Sironar W
    By jeroldharter in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17-Dec-2009, 22:17
  2. Opinions on Nikkor W 210mm f/5.6 vs. Rodenstock APO Sironar S 210mm f/5.6
    By Jamal Morris in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9-Dec-1999, 16:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •