View Poll Results: Worst Photographic Bogeymen

Voters
128. You may not vote on this poll
  • Microcontrast

    11 8.59%
  • Diffraction

    8 6.25%
  • Circle of Confusion

    19 14.84%
  • Film Flatness

    5 3.91%
  • Reciprocity failure

    7 5.47%
  • Optimized for 1:1 (re: lenses)

    4 3.13%
  • "3D Look" (re: lenses)

    21 16.41%
  • Rendering (re: lenses)

    15 11.72%
  • Grain aliasing

    14 10.94%
  • Tripod stability

    6 4.69%
  • None of the above—each is a real concern

    12 9.38%
  • Other

    49 38.28%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 20 of 23 FirstFirst ... 101819202122 ... LastLast
Results 191 to 200 of 229

Thread: Worst Photographic Buzzword

  1. #191

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    [QUOTE=E. von Hoegh;705928]
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbie Shymanski View Post

    Yep. There's a downside, which is that dreck will be preserved for posterity.

    Collodion plates seem pretty long lived, but they were such a bear to make that most were pretty well thought out. I think.
    The only art proved to be archival are cave and rock paintings.

  2. #192
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Skeoch View Post
    I never liked the term "available light". I think what's available depends on how many lights you own, or can rent.
    Existing Light makes way more sense. At least that's what Arnold Newman told me, and he used available light all the time.
    -Rob
    Available light to me is NOT lighting equipment that I could drag in. It is the light found at the location where I am shooting. The example was taken using a tripod, no additional lighting was brought in by me or used by me. Any troglodyte can drag around lighting equipment, it takes a REAL photographer to use only what is available at the scene! ROTFLMAOHMHOTD!!!

    Steve
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  3. #193
    Robert Brummitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Beaverton, Oregon
    Posts
    445

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    I guess then John Sexton is not a photographer. He tells a story of pulling a flash from his bag to use as a fill light. As he says, "It's available light. It was in my camera bag."

  4. #194

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    304

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Buzzword

  5. #195
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Robert, I knew that I could count on you to cover my back.

    Steve
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  6. #196

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Shutterbug.

  7. #197

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon - HP Marketing View Post
    Why not? There are zoom lenses, varifocal lenses and prime lenses. These are terms that have been in use for decades in photography. But more common in movies and video then in still work.
    There are zooms, varifocals and fixed focal lengths. ALL are prime lenses, when you add a supplementary lens, such as a closeup diopter, or reverse another lens for an ultra closeup. Single-focal-length lenses were simply "lenses" until somebody stole or misused a perfectly good technical term for something it didn't mean.

  8. #198

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan Davenport View Post
    There are zooms, varifocals and fixed focal lengths. ALL are prime lenses, when you add a supplementary lens, such as a closeup diopter, or reverse another lens for an ultra closeup. Single-focal-length lenses were simply "lenses" until somebody stole or misused a perfectly good technical term for something it didn't mean.
    Fixed are primes, zooms are not primes. Simple as that. To either you can add auxiallary lenses. So Aux. lenses can be added to your prime lens or to your zoom lens.

    Really is quite simple.

  9. #199

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon - HP Marketing View Post
    Fixed are primes, zooms are not primes. Simple as that. To either you can add auxiallary lenses. So Aux. lenses can be added to your prime lens or to your zoom lens.

    Really is quite simple.
    What we have here, is an example of language evolving. I can't argue that the word is used as you say, now. It wasn't always that way.

    Sadly, you've gone over to the dark side...

  10. #200
    tom thomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jenks, Oklahoma and Domazan, Gard, France
    Posts
    285

    Re: Worst Photographic Buzzword

    bokay

Similar Threads

  1. The hopeful future of film photography
    By Ed Eubanks in forum On Photography
    Replies: 414
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2011, 07:41
  2. Master printers
    By Gustavo in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29-Jan-2010, 18:18

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •