Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

  1. #1
    Land-Scapegrace Heroique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Wash.
    Posts
    2,929

    T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    I keep hearing the following question in the darkroom world:

    “How do I create a specific ratio of T-Max rs w/ water (for example, if I want 1:4 or 1:7 or 1:9, etc.)?”

    Note 1: What I try to describe below is longer than it needs to be for most people. If you’re new to T-Max rs, I’d say keep it simple – just follow Kodak’s mixing directions, and use their recommended development times. No reason to worry too much about “ratios” until you have more experience – and some experienced users might say there’s no reason at all!
    Note 2: Please keep in mind this is for T-Max rs, not T-Max “non-rs,” a different developer.

    -----
    I’ve noticed that for most people, Kodak does not make this “ratio question” easy to answer. (For example, to create any ratio, do you start with the A+B concentrate, or do you start with the mixed stock? Creating, say, 1:9 the first way gives you something very, very different than creating 1:9 the second way. )

    Sure, the T-Max rs packaging instructions are clear about how to mix the package’s total contents (A & B) w/ water, but nowhere do they say what final ratio this yields. And as far as I can tell, Kodak’s T-Max rs publication says nothing about this ratio either (though strangely, it does define the “concentrate mix ratio” for T-Max “non-rs” on page 9, but I’ll stay on topic for now).

    So I thought I’d try some quick math for myself, since Kodak doesn’t seem to trust me to theirs.

    I started w/ their popular boxed version of T-Max rs that makes 3.8 liters/1 gallon. I’ll stick w/ the metric system because it’s easier. The first step is to note the volumes of part A & part B:

    Part A: 757 ml
    Part B: 15 ml
    Total: 772 ml (A+B)

    Next, you’re supposed to add enough water to make 3.8 liters.

    Now, it’s quite easy to add water to make 3.8 liters – anyone can do that – but exactly how much water did you just add? (We’ll need to know if we’re going to talk ratios.)

    A little more math gives the answer:
    3.8 liters (or, 3,800 ml) – 772 ml (A+B solution) = 3,028 ml water.

    Okay, so what ratio does this create?

    The exact ratio is 772ml:3,028ml (or “772ml + 3,028ml”).
    More quick math reduces this to about 1:3.9 (rounded).
    But let’s just say 1:4 to keep it simple. That’s the real-life answer.

    (Perhaps Kodak doesn’t just tell us it’s 1:4 because everyone would howl that it’s really 1:3.922279793[…]; and maybe Kodak doesn’t say it’s this irrational number, because everyone would howl that, more practically, it’s 1:4. )

    Be this as it may, in their T-Max rs publication, Kodak gives you time tables to develop various films w/ this solution – w/o ever identifying it as a 1:4 solution. But if you use these tables, that is the assumption. (And you’ll notice their recommended times are relatively quick for this rather strong dilution; for example, they say develop TMax-100 sheet film, in a tray, for 5.25 minutes in 72 degrees F.)

    Also remember, this 1:4 solution acts as the replenisher. If you use T-Max rs as a one-shot developer, this isn’t important. But if you use the replenishing process, the 1:4 solution is your replenisher, and you’re supposed to be replenishing exhausted developer that is also 1:4.

    Now, many people like the 1:9 ratio. I suspect they’ve heard “1:9” from John Sexton at this forum link, and they want to “do what John does.” But how did John arrive at this 1:9 solution? He doesn’t say.

    But there are two easy ways to create 1:9 (or any other ratio) if that’s what you want:

    1) Bypass the “1:4” preparations above, and just go ahead and add to the A+B solution an appropriate amount of water for the amount of developer you need. For example, if you want to start w/ 1000 ml of developer, divide that amount by 10 (since 1:9 is “10 parts total”). Your result is 100 ml per part. Therefore, your A+B amount is 100ml (1 part x 100ml), and your water amount is 900ml (9 parts x 100ml). The math is somewhat different for other ratios. For example, for 1:7, you would divide by 8...

    2) If you’re a “replenisher person,” chances are you already have a stock of 1:4 solution on your shelf. If you want 1:9, you would simply mix your 1:4 solution w/ an equal portion water (i.e., 1:1). In other words, you simply double its volume with water. For example, if you want 1000 ml of 1:9 in your tray, add 500 ml of the 1:4 solution + 500 ml of water. Presto, you have 1000ml of 1:9 solution. Again, the math is slightly different for other ratios.

    -----
    Too much for most, but I hope all this helps put the T-Max rs “ratio question” to rest for anyone who’s been curious about the matter…


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    1+9 = 1:10, unless you're a photographer, then 1+9 = 1:9. Simple!

  3. #3
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay DeFehr View Post
    1+9 = 1:10, unless you're a photographer, then 1+9 = 1:9. Simple!
    Hehehehe. Did you see my post in the other thread?

  4. #4
    Format Omnivore Brian C. Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    2,997

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    Jay, do you mean that if I see a chemical ratio as "1+9", that means 1:10, so 11 parts total? If something is written 1:9, then it's 10 parts total, and referred to as "1+8"?

    (Or is this something to do with Roger?)
    Last edited by Brian C. Miller; 16-Mar-2011 at 17:21. Reason: Just saw Roger's post

  5. #5
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian C. Miller View Post
    Jay, do you mean that if I see a chemical ratio as "1+9", that means 1:10, so 11 parts total? If something is written 1:9, then it's 10 parts total, and referred to as "1+8"?

    (Or is this something to do with Roger?)
    I'm pretty sure he means what I meant in the other thread, that photographers have for decades now used ratios in a way that isn't consistent with how chemists use them. When a chemist sees or writes "1:9" he means a ratio of the first item to total parts - one part concentrate or chemical to nine parts total solution, which could also be written as 1+8. But when a photographer writes that what he really means is 1+9, which is one part whatever plus nine parts of water, a ratio that using a colon would properly be written as "1:10."

    It's really a case where trying to clear it up adds confusion where there was none before as everyone pretty much knows that in photography the usage is now different.

    So, in photography:

    1:9 OR 1+9 means one part concentrate or chemical plus nine parts of water.

    But in most other usage:

    1:9 means one part concentrate or chemical in nine parts of total solution, so 1:9 = 1+8 (except in photography, see above!)

  6. #6
    Land-Scapegrace Heroique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Wash.
    Posts
    2,929

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    Quote Originally Posted by Heroique View Post
    The exact ratio is 772ml:3,028ml (or “772ml + 3,028ml”).
    That’s a concrete example of my photographer’s bias – they mean the same thing.

    However, why X:Y = X+Y rings true to some people, and plainly false to others, deserves a dedicated thread!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay DeFehr View Post
    1+9 = 1:10, unless you're a photographer, then 1+9 = 1:9. Simple!
    Jay: Back on the main topic, are you starting from concentrate, or stock, and why did you choose one or the other if, say, 1:9 is what you want to end-up with? How would the choice make a difference in your mixing?


  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    See? Simple!

  8. #8
    Richard M. Coda
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    973

    Re: T-Max rs mixing ratios – or, “what does 1:9 REALLY mean?”

    AFTER you mix Part A + Part B... 100 ml concentrate with 900 ml H2O = 1000 ml.
    Photographs by Richard M. Coda
    my blog
    Primordial: 2010 - Photographs of the Arizona Monsoon
    "Speak softly and carry an 8x10"
    "I shoot a HYBRID - Arca/Canham 11x14"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •