Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

  1. #11
    Glenn Mellen
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Southlake, Texas
    Posts
    207

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    Using Manfrotto rectangular plates on all my cameras, yes I've in the past had occurrences of the ballhead plates working loose, but never to the point of worrying about having the camera fall off.

    The best fix (at least in my opinion) is simply a drop of removeable LocTite (blue).

    As I have more than one camera which shares the same tripods, cannot imagine the inconveniences of not using quick release heads.

    Glenn

  2. #12
    Format Omnivore Brian C. Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    2,997

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I use Bogen/Manfrotto hex plates. There are two types: one with additional anchor screws and one without. The one with the anchor screws needs a coin or screwdriver to fasten the main screw, and then the other screws are tightened down. The one without the anchor screws has a huge wheel on it to lock down the plate.

    I have two tripods, one with a ball head and one with a pan head, and four cameras which use the same plates. I like the system, so I'm sticking with it.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    680

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    Yes, the 3047 plates have hard rubber that can slip and I've had cameras turn and loosen. With a wood base view camera it's worse, with a solid aluminum plate it's even more of a problem, there is nothing to grip onto. I use the head with a Calumet C1 and what I've done is to purchase a dedicated plate and use the 3/8" for the main and amazingly the 1/4" lines up with the 1/4" hold in the camera base. There is absolutely no slip in it now.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    914

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I've used RRS plates on four different field cameras and never had one budge. I start with solvent-cleaned dry threads and then use LocTite Blue (as Glenn recommends); I torque the hell out of the screw and then never touch it again.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    575

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I use the Manfrotto hex plates and routinely drill and tap extra holes for rotation stops of various sorts. That covers the DSLR, P67 and Gowland Pocket. The Sinar and B&J are bolted directly to a couple of old Gitzo heads. I've got a long Manfrotto plate meant for movie equipment but haven't made up my mind on it yet as it isn't as wide as I would like.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    The RRS variation on the Arca plates seems the best QR to me - lots of options incorporating some form of a keystop to eliminate twist. And lots of options for the female receivers. A strategic drop of Loctite isn't a bad idea either.

    But it's also kind of a Mafia operation, all of the sudden you need a $50-$150 plate for each camera...

    After going down that road for a few years I now prefer and use a traditional screw and am in the habit of checking it before I lift the tripod, before I make camera movements, etc. My camera is rarely loose but it's a good habit I don't want to break.

    Linhof and Sinar do their tripod screws right, with spring loading and nice, fat wheels to spin. But the Gitzo screw and cork top have never failed me, and even the Tiltall is fine if not overloaded.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    680

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I replace a top on a Linhof ball head, an older model, with cork and it holds great.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Valley of the Sun, AZ
    Posts
    682

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryS View Post
    For view cameras, I've found an anti-twist mechanism is necessary. Either multiple screws to attach the plate to the camera, or inset rubber pads on the quick release plate.
    I either do this, or mill a shallow slot or recess to just fit the camera base (my preferred way if possible).
    They are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea.
    -Francis Bacon

  9. #19

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I'm a true newcomer here. I picked up a Tachihara 4x5 kit earlier in the month and just got a suitable tripod for Christmas. Feisol 3402 with a PhotoClam 40N ballhead (a huge thank you to everyone who has discussed tripods here and at APUG, I would have been lost without that archive of info).

    The last bit I needed was a quick replace plate. Based on some positive feedback I read here, I went with the Wimberley P-50. It has 2 screws so it is rather secure.

    I took it out for the first time today and loved it. The biggest problem was the torque loosening the ballhead/tripod connection itself. I need to get that screwed in a big tighter but once that is done, I should be set.

  10. #20

    Re: Re-Thinking Quick Release Plates

    I use the Linhof modified to a Foba superball. It is a little finicky to get the camera engaged on it, but it holds like the dickens. I usually hike with the camera attached. If your plates have a secondary set screw, use it.

Similar Threads

  1. Linhof Cable Release & Quick Connect
    By William D. Lester in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2002, 14:02

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •