Nice image, thanks for contributing.
A nude body in nature while in practice might be contrived, but perhaps less than other settings where the nude setting is surely contrived. You've avoided this skillfully by using a composite to subtract that context and replace it with other art.
A child doesn't feel contrived running around outdoors with no clothes, it's pure freedom. Somehow, we've departed from that as we age. If you have spent time outdoors in nature with no clothes (in comfortable nonsexual situations even briefly like changing or washing outdoors when camping not at a camp site) contrived doesn't describe things; you are quickly aware that there is nothing between you and nature. It's more real than words easily describe. That close connection to nature artfully portrayed elevates and separate nature nudes from simple exhibitionism. (Artist skills do this too, but I consider that a separate factor) That 100% connection to nature has vicarious benefit to viewers of the image who yearn to be someplace different perhaps for a simple beautiful place like in the photo.
No doubt, many nudes have a successful sexual component, and perhaps thats a major part of why we prefer female nudes. However, even in a non-sexual sense, I think womens bodies just plain look better. Sort of like how male birds look better, female humans look better.
Bookmarks