Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: caltar 210 f6.8

  1. #1

    caltar 210 f6.8

    How is the rodenstock/caltar 210mm f6.8? Is the newest version a good (cheaper, lighter) alternative to the f5.6 caltar ii n? I'll probably use it mainly for 6x9. thanks, Pete

  2. #2
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,960

    caltar 210 f6.8

    Pete,

    I have the Caltar II-E 210mm f/6.8. I use it for 4x5. It is a multicoated triplet, and I have had good results using it, enlarging to 8x10 and 11x14. The lens is compact and lightweight. However, I have not used it for a smaller format. Lot's of very nice large format images were made with triplets before the introduction of lens coating and multicoating. However, I am not sure how it will perform as a lens used primarily for 120 or 220 film. The 210mm Caltar II-N certainly has the more impressive specifications (other than the ones you mentioned - price and weight). Although I am happy with my lens for 4x5 use, I just don't know if I can recommend it for the smaller format.

Similar Threads

  1. Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)
    By Jason Syring in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5-Nov-2006, 11:31
  2. Caltar
    By Joe Hudgens in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2005, 06:25
  3. Caltar 90 f8
    By Brian Legere in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2000, 15:53
  4. 90 f/8 Caltar WII
    By Don Sparks in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-May-2000, 22:38
  5. Is the 360 mm Caltar IIs a bargin, a dog, or something else?
    By Chris Hawkins in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-Jan-2000, 06:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •