Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: First fluid mounted scans...question

  1. #1

    First fluid mounted scans...question

    About to scan a bunch of 4x5 trannys using the Epson V750 and Epson scan. The prints will be 20x30 printed at 254 dpi. So I will set the target size in Epson scan but a little confused about what to set as the resolution. I see a lot of users scan at 2200 dpi but there is no way my pc can handle file sizes like that. Besides, the image is to be down rezzed anyway?
    I guess I am tring to figure out a workable resolution to use that will not slow the computer down to a snails pace.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,176

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    There was a lot of discussion on a recent thread about how it is possible (but not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt) that the native resolution of the Epson scanners is 1600 and that really scanning at anything higher is not going to get you much if anything.

    I did my own experiments and found that scanning at 1600 and UPSIZING in photoshop to 2400 was actually sharper than scanning at 2400. Your mileage may vary.

    You need to read all of this thread for the full story...

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ad.php?t=63718

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by John NYC View Post
    There was a lot of discussion on a recent thread about how it is possible (but not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt) that the native resolution of the Epson scanners is 1600 and that really scanning at anything higher is not going to get you much if anything.

    I did my own experiments and found that scanning at 1600 and UPSIZING in photoshop to 2400 was actually sharper than scanning at 2400. Your mileage may vary.

    You need to read all of this thread for the full story...

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ad.php?t=63718
    He is scanning 4x5. He should be using the hi res system. It works quite well but focus is different for each machine. He must find his best focus height before anything else.

    I've never scanned on my glass as I have a 4x5.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by coops View Post
    About to scan a bunch of 4x5 trannys using the Epson V750 and Epson scan. The prints will be 20x30 printed at 254 dpi. So I will set the target size in Epson scan but a little confused about what to set as the resolution. I see a lot of users scan at 2200 dpi but there is no way my pc can handle file sizes like that. Besides, the image is to be down rezzed anyway?
    I guess I am tring to figure out a workable resolution to use that will not slow the computer down to a snails pace.
    I generally scan at 3200 spi on my Epson V700. The 340 Mb files are small enough to not be a problem and large enough to print pretty big. I just do 16x20 myself. You have a bit less than 15000x12000 to play with.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,176

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by PenGun View Post
    He is scanning 4x5. He should be using the hi res system. It works quite well but focus is different for each machine. He must find his best focus height before anything else.

    I've never scanned on my glass as I have a 4x5.
    It doesn't matter what you are scanning. If the scanners highest native resolution is 1600, going higher is just going to interpolate, like upsizing in Photoshop.

    Did you read the whole thread? Tim Parkin only does 4x5 and found the same thing.

  6. #6

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by PenGun View Post
    I generally scan at 3200 spi on my Epson V700. The 340 Mb files are small enough to not be a problem and large enough to print pretty big. I just do 16x20 myself. You have a bit less than 15000x12000 to play with.
    I must be missing something basic. Does a 16x20 file at 3200 not weigh in at over 9 gigs? How do you get 340 megs?
    Last edited by coops; 10-Aug-2010 at 19:34. Reason: spelling error

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by John NYC View Post
    It doesn't matter what you are scanning. If the scanners highest native resolution is 1600, going higher is just going to interpolate, like upsizing in Photoshop.

    Did you read the whole thread? Tim Parkin only does 4x5 and found the same thing.
    You have no idea how many times we've been through this. Maybe search this forum.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by coops View Post
    I must be missing something basic. Does a 16x20 file at 3200 not weigh in at over 9 gigs? How do you get 340 megs?
    B&W. I should have said that. It's true this about trannys. We are scanning 4x5 in this thread.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,176

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by PenGun View Post
    You have no idea how many times we've been through this. Maybe search this forum.
    I tested the 1600 dpi theory using 8x10 and MF 6x7 on my scanner myself.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: First fluid mounted scans...question

    Quote Originally Posted by John NYC View Post
    I tested the 1600 dpi theory using 8x10 and MF 6x7 on my scanner myself.
    I have a scanner too. I have tested my 35mm and my 4x5. I am confident mine at least is very near focus.

    There is actual improvement up to 6400 spi but it's not much. 3200 spi works for me quite well.

Similar Threads

  1. Shouldn't these drum scans be better than this?
    By paulr in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2008, 23:02
  2. Imacon Scans and Flexcolor
    By Julian Boulter in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-Jan-2008, 04:21
  3. Declining Quality of 4990 Scans
    By Brian Vuillemenot in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2007, 21:58
  4. Epson V750 Pro 8X10 Negative Question...
    By jim kitchen in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2-Jul-2006, 19:00
  5. photoshop CMYK Color Correction question
    By richard_5660 in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8-Jul-2005, 16:26

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •