Hi guys,
I know that I'm sticking my nose in a bee's nest, especially considering that it's my first post in this forum ...
... but here comes a sincere question from someone who is pondering large format photography as a means to getting into ultra high resolution prints. The last months I thought that medium format digital is the be and end all in terms of photographic quality, especially with those high prices in mind I thought it must be the best.
After a lot more reading though, I reckon that to achieve the highest quality possible analog is still the way to go?
My question is this: In 2010, with the p65+ and H4D-60 (soon, apparently) around as the best digital backs, how does medium format digital compare to large format photography?
Can one achieve similar print sizes or not with digital means? Or is ist still a completely different ballgame? After more than a year after the p65+'s introduction I'd be happy to hear some experiences?
What resolution can one squeeze out of a 8 x 10 negative with the best available hardware? somewhere I read that it is about 19500 x X pixels?
I know that here's a thread about this, but the this picture got me thinking .... :
http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/853...-Entertainment
...
Kind regards
Paul
Bookmarks