Digital sensors obsolesed by digital film!

[D. Bryant]

http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/s...leID=224000253

Let the moaning begin!

[Mark Sawyer]

*moan*

[Donald Miller]

While I really don't know about this process it became quite apparent that every claim in the article is highly subjective. I will wait until the process is adopted by industry...till then I will continue to use my 1DS III

[Brian Stein]

I went and asked my D80 how it felt about being doubly obsolescent. It shrugged and took another picture

[SAShruby]

I guess 5 years from now I will buy full 4x5 sensor for $2.50???

[ic-racer]

Its just another type of digital sensor. Has nothing to do with what we know as "film."

[JRFrench]

It could have the ability to make very large sensors cheaper/high yeild. That would be interesting.

[sanking]

It could have the ability to make very large sensors cheaper/high yeild. That would be interesting.

Then we could all make razor sharp prints hundreds of square meters in size. Perhaps by then someone will have a device that will allow us to project the images on the clouds, or perhaps the moon?

Sandy King

[Thebes]

Sigh... some digital upstart's marketing department has decided to steal the word "film"?
Figures...
I see imbeciles calling digital prints turned blue "cyanotypes".
I see an ebayer upselling an epson print as a "contact print".
Now some creative jerks are going to market a new digital sensor as "film"
Just great. Moan.

[bobwysiwyg]

I went and asked my D80 how it felt about being doubly obsolescent. It shrugged and took another picture