Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    20mins north of boston
    Posts
    499

    Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    With all the time I have spent here ,In my mind you folks Praise and worship those Lens made by them: So here is my question, If their that good on Large format lens
    How would they be for 35mm lens , I just purchased a TT&H Lens for My Fed-2 Model=B4 it is as follows: Of yes was bought in the USA not over seas

    Leitz 5 cm f 1.5 Summarit lens
    This is a chrome lens in a screw mount introduced in 1949 as a coated post war replacement for the uncoated Schneider Xenon 50mm f1.5. Except for some minor optical design modification, it is substantially identical in design, it is a modified double Gaussian formulation with four central cemented elements; it has a front singlet and a split rear element. Early lenses (such as this lens) which were made for export have The Taylor, Taylor & Hobson U.S. patent number No 2019985.


    This lens will need a good cleaning other wise its in Decent shape :Seawolf
    Lauren MacIntosh

    Whats in back of you is the past and whats in front of you is the future now in the middle you have choices to make for yourself:

  2. #2
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    It must be more than substantially identical for it to have been a Patented design. But at that time the TTH 35mm lenses where far better than the Leica/Leitz made equivalents which is why they usually fetch very high prices.

    Ian

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    20mins north of boston
    Posts
    499

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by IanG View Post
    It must be more than substantially identical for it to have been a Patented design. But at that time the TTH 35mm lenses where far better than the Leica/Leitz made equivalents which is why they usually fetch very high prices.

    Ian
    Ian: Thank you for your time and info:
    Lauren MacIntosh

    Whats in back of you is the past and whats in front of you is the future now in the middle you have choices to make for yourself:

  4. #4
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    It should be a very good lens, possibly a close relative of a TT&H Cine lens. TT&H were a top line of lenses for the motion picture industry, (for that matter, they still are), and they're much better known and respected for those lenses than for the large format lenses, which are now a minor side-line for them.
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  5. #5
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    TTH and Meyer both offered fast lenses well before Leitz, there were f2 Cooke Series O's (35mm - 140mm FL) and f1.5 Meyer's for formats from 35mm upwards to 9x12cm in the late 1920's.

    A.O.Roth the UK Meyer distributor were selling a Leica bodied camera with an f1.5 Meyer Plasmat in 1927, for £39 in comparison the same camera from Leica with an f3.5 lens was £18 15s.

    The link between TTH & Leitz after WWII is quite interesting because TTH set up Reid & Sigrist with UK Government backing to manufacture Leica based Reid cameras, they can't really be called copies because Reid were given access to the Leitz designs and the rights to use them as part of War reparations. Leitz didn't give access to the pre-War Leica 4 prototypes which later became the M series.

    I should have something about the TTH Summarit, and other Cooke lenses for 35mm hand cameras back in the UK, I'll look when I'm there in about 3 weeks.

    Ian

  6. #6

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    It should be a very good lens, possibly a close relative of a TT&H Cine lens.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    20mins north of boston
    Posts
    499

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    Super Speed Panchro f1.3 Several lenses occur in this group. Lee designed an OPIC with a split rear glass
    in USPat 2,619,895/1935; Brit Pat 373,950/1932; 397,281 (Tay006). This parallels a Schneider Xenon f1.3
    design and the patent number was engraved on some Leitz f1.5 50mm Xenon and Summarit lenses. TTH
    production of these lenses seems to be small, and they are very sought after. Some Super Speed Panchros
    at least have a quite different 1+2 i 1+3 design (Tay025)and may be triplet derivatives.

    This all I could find on Vada Mercum for taylor, taylor & Hobson:
    Lauren MacIntosh

    Whats in back of you is the past and whats in front of you is the future now in the middle you have choices to make for yourself:

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    20mins north of boston
    Posts
    499

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    More Info on the lens only 103 were made in 1939 serial #491898 to # 492000 and my serial number is # 491956 Am boy am I smiling {LOL}
    Lauren MacIntosh

    Whats in back of you is the past and whats in front of you is the future now in the middle you have choices to make for yourself:

  9. #9
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    In the 1939 British Journal Photographic Almanac (pub Nov 1938) Leitz still list the 50mm f1.5 Xenon which was £34, but their f2 lens is still the Summar.

    By contrast Zeiss are selling a 50mm f1.4 Biotar for Cine or miniature cameras for £26 15s, this was available for Leica and Contax. TTH don't list their range, there an image of their Portrait lens along with a portrait (Hollywood glamour style) but their strap-line is:

    COOKE LENSES - PRIDE OF CRAFTSMEN
    and CHOICE OF THE ARTIST

    Ian

  10. #10

    Re: Taylor, Taylor and Hobson Lens

    I have this lens, although not of the TT&H designation. I've considered selling it many times but can't seem to do it. IMO it is not an all around lens. Low contrast, very flare prone and quite soft at large apature, 1.5 almost not usable. It improves somewhat on stopping down, I can't consider it a speed lens. Why do I still have it? If you shoot this lens in well lit open shade (no sunlight in background) with color film the results can be very very nice. All other situations, you will do a lot better with something else. I don't know if TT&H changes this. Have fun with it.

Similar Threads

  1. lens hood
    By epack in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 22-Dec-2008, 21:26
  2. Can bellows "stretch" lens?
    By Ken Grooms in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2006, 19:35
  3. When to switch to a macro lens?
    By William Mortensen in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 22-Jun-2006, 08:46
  4. Picking ideal lens and fl, for flat copy work
    By bglick in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 8-Feb-2006, 21:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •