Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: CF necessary on the 47XL ?

  1. #11

    CF necessary on the 47XL ?

    I'm considering this 47XL on a Cambo Wide DS. Is it possible to somehow use the CF behind the lens in this body, or a standard bag bellows view camera body? I suppose that if the rear lens element diameter were much smaller than the front, that the filter might not work, but I don't have them to examine. As long as the center spot gradient accomplished its job, as determined by real world testing, that's all that should count.

    I use many other filters behind the lens to avoid flare problems.

    Myco http://www.megasoidstudios.com

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    CF necessary on the 47XL ?

    "Is it possible to somehow use the CF behind the lens in this body, or a standard bag bellows view camera body?"

    No. Placing a filter in back of a lens makes it become part of the optical system of the lens. It will cause a focus shift = to 1/3rd the thickness of the filter, it will degrade th image if there are any marks, scuffs, cleaning marks, finger prints, dust, dirt, etc. Filters belong in front of the lens unless the lens was designed for specific filters to be placed inside or behind the lens.

    flare is easily controlled by compendiums, gobos, coatings, etc and CF especially bre for the front.

  3. #13

    CF necessary on the 47XL ?

    Wow, thanks Bob! As Johnny Carson used to say in metered verse, "I did not know that." I suppose that since I've only used gel filters behind lenses, I haven't seen such optical effects. I'm now curious and will experiment with some thicker glass filters behind lenses, just to learn.

    In my use of 65mm lenses on 4x5, I've exploited the luminance falloff to the corners and sides. And then, there's Photoshop, since everything is scanned and improved there anyway. So I may just end up doing that with the even more extreme falloff inherent in a 47mmXL, as long as there is sufficient shadow detail in the falloff areas--or, could shoot a 1 and 2 stop series of overexposed chromes and merge them with gradient masks in Photoshop--but only if I had a flare situation with a CF in front of the lens.

    I've found that for lenses as wide as a 65mm on 4x5 and wider, that compendium shades and the like won't work without vignetting--I usually try to make a flag to gobo the flare source if possible.

    Myco http://www.megasoidstudios.com

Similar Threads

  1. Schneider SA 47xl on Ebony 45su
    By John Brady in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Nov-2005, 18:51
  2. 47XL with Arca 6x9 - movements restricted?
    By Sandy Sorlien in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 3-Dec-2001, 13:42
  3. Ghost image with SA 47XL?
    By Paul Schilliger in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Jul-2000, 18:00

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •