Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New Macbook Pro question

  1. #1

    New Macbook Pro question

    I am going to get a new MBP 15". Is it worth the $200 to get the model with the Nvidia 9600 video card. The only graphic intensive use is large scans of 4x5 negs (greyscale) using a layers based workflow using Photoshop.

    Thanks,
    Peter

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Payson, AZ
    Posts
    163

    Re: New Macbook Pro question

    I doubt if the graphics card will matter much with Photoshop but you may find the MBP a bit slow. I traded mine on a Mac Pro and its much faster and more versatile.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Humble, Texas
    Posts
    58

    Re: New Macbook Pro question

    I have an older MBP 15" 2.33Ghz Core II duo, OS-X 10.6.2. Photoshop CS4 Extended still runs well on it. Although, I only have 2Gb of RAM and larger files, 200Mb and higher, do tend to slow the machine down. Photoshop is a memory hog, so I think more memory would be more beneficial than a faster processor or more cores. If you're planning to run PS CS4 on it, you might want the better video card. Photoshop CS4 utilizes OpenGL and pushes several functions off on the GPU, so a better card might help performance. Take a look at what Adobe says:

    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html

    Richard

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Germany, Aalen
    Posts
    849

    Re: New Macbook Pro question

    In general - for still images the graphic card does not matter much. If you were working with videos or 3D graphics that is a different story. Get more RAM as suggested. I have a 13" MacBook (the first aluminum version - not the Pro) and CS3 runs fine. But with 2 GB of RAM everything takes long with large files.

    I have recently (finally) adopted the strategy where you scale down the original image (as a copy - you keep the original master file of course), do all your adjustment (levels, curves, adjustment levels, masks, etc ...) and once you are happy with that you scale it up again and paste the original image in as a new layer - so only the very last steps (final cropping, sharpening, etc) will take long. It really helps when your original image is 2000 dpi scan from 4x5 (cca 70 Mpix image - 400MB in 48bit color mode)
    Matus

Similar Threads

  1. Enlarger Question
    By Dave_B in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2009, 14:53
  2. MacBook Pro?
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 9-Feb-2007, 16:03
  3. ?16 bit image editing Programs - PaintSho Pro?
    By Michael Heald in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2006, 11:15
  4. New Epson scanners : V-750M Pro & V-700 Photo
    By Ellis Vener in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 2-Mar-2006, 09:26
  5. 3200 Epson Pro Scanner versus the Non Pro Version for LF
    By neil poulsen in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2003, 23:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •