Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Any hope for touching negatives?

  1. #1

    Any hope for touching negatives?

    Classic problem of two negatives touching while in the developer, front to back. The one that was touching on its back turned out okay, but the one that was touching on front of course didn't get enough developer and looks like a cigarette burn. Beautiful negative otherwise. Any hope for it?

    I can't imagine there's anything I can do for it but thought I'd ask just in case.

  2. #2
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosaiya View Post
    Classic problem of two negatives touching while in the developer, front to back. The one that was touching on its back turned out okay, but the one that was touching on front of course didn't get enough developer and looks like a cigarette burn. Beautiful negative otherwise. Any hope for it?
    Truly the only hope for it is that it didn't die in vain -- that you learned what you did wrong and corrected your workflow so you won't do it again in the future. Photography is all about learning from our mistakes, and becoming better photographers for it.

    Bruce Watson

  3. #3

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    I figured as much, thanks. Still waiting for that learning curve to flatten out a bit.

  4. #4
    Eric Woodbury
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,651

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    Crop
    my picture blog
    ejwoodbury.blogspot.com

  5. #5

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    Unfortunately it's dead center and fairly large.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,261

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    Perfect opportunity for that donut fold mounting technique I learned last year!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    2,049

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    If it's a beautiful negative you realized the potential at the instant of capture. So process the backup you took at the time.

    Nate Potter, Austin TX.

  8. #8

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    I did recognize the potential at the moment and felt lucky to capture it at all. In the time it took to reload the next sheet it was all over. Fortunately there were, and ever are, more moments but the ones that get away are always the most sweet.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,261

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    Of course you took a DSLR backup of it, didn't you?

    Otherwise, chalk it up to experience and try again later.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Re: Any hope for touching negatives?

    If the image is there but of low density and contrast, you should be able to scan and then restore it a pixel at a time in Photoshop. Lots of tedious work, but possible if the final print is worth it.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

Similar Threads

  1. Underexposed negatives make for better scans?
    By Sylvester Graham in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 17-Jun-2007, 20:41
  2. Test for Pyro Negatives on Graded Silver Paper
    By sanking in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-Jul-2006, 15:32
  3. 60 Year Old Negatives - Impressive!
    By Michael J. Kravit in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 3-Oct-2003, 17:33
  4. Heavy Residue on 4x5 Negatives after Processing
    By Andre Noble in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 26-Jul-2001, 02:27
  5. Paper Negatives?
    By Emile J Schwarz in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2-Sep-2000, 12:34

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •