Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Reccomendations for *second* lens for architecture

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    1,905

    Reccomendations for *second* lens for architecture

    Here are my thought

    I used a 125, 90, 75 and 58 for my wide angle set. The 75 and the 90 are quite different and worth having one of each. The 58 is also different than the 75 and worth having. I skipped a 65 becasue the models that were out when I was working offered little movement whereas the 75 and 58 had movement (front rise is used a lot). The 125 - a 120 would be the same - was noticeably longer than the 90.

    After the 90 well if you need something qwider go for the 75/72. If you need something longer go for the 110/120/125. Let your needs decide what you need next.

    steve simmons

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    68

    Reccomendations for *second* lens for architecture

    paul is right on - you need to consider which application is most important right now, interiors or exteriors. if interiors, go with the 58 or 65, as the 72 is not as significantly wider than the 90 as you will want. my preference is the 65, as i think that is really about as far as you can push current lens manufacturing techniques and get truly accurate renderings for architecture. as ellis points out, any wider than about 58mm and the lens becomes increasingly more difficult to handle - any disparity from absolute level becomes immediately obvious on the print (in a way which might not have been so apparent on the ground glass, unfortunately). if you do more exteriors, i would recommend a 135mm, as it is the widest of the "normal" lenses for 4x5 - it is normal enough to give a very natural perspective in situations where you can get a reasonable distance from the subject, and it is long enough to be your "telephoto" for detail views.

  3. #13

    Reccomendations for *second* lens for architecture

    The general rule for interiors is "use the longest lens you can get away with" t o minimize distoration. Of course there are occasions where you have no choice a nd need the wider lens. I would go with a 65mm first and then a 120mm after that. I assume you are shooting 4x5 sheet film. With newer and better films, some (such as myself) shoot 6x7cm or 6x8cm roll film backs. The 65mm is great lens wi th 6x7 format for exteriors -- about the same as a 120mm on 4x5". In any rate, I shoot with 47, 65, 90, 150, 210 and 300.

Similar Threads

  1. Just bought a C-1, need reccomendations
    By Chris S in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2006, 20:44
  2. First lens for landscape & architecture with Shenhao 4x5
    By Nghi Hoang in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 24-Feb-2006, 14:47
  3. 110 or 90 for 4x5 architecture
    By alex sjoeberg in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 28-Mar-2005, 06:49
  4. 80 SS Xl and 110 SS XL for architecture?
    By Michael Mutmansky in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 6-May-2002, 08:53
  5. Lens and Filters for Architecture and Interiors
    By David Payumo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 3-Apr-2001, 05:59

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •