It would be quite nice to see this shutter tested for View Camera magazine. Perhaps someone can lead the way to make that possible. Speculation one way or the other without actual data serves no purpose beyond fueling arguments. On a very simple presumption, gravity changes very little with altitude, and can be considered reliable; considering that many shutters are off a bit at each setting, I would rather know accuracy of settings than other claims. The slit width idea has been used many decades in focal plane shutters, so the basic idea of that is not new.
I would prefer to see something like this on the market, than to see no solution. Some here address this in such a manner that it seems they would rather kill off such ideas. Yet when products do disappear, is it any surprise when people bitch about the lack of innovation or attempts to make anything. If this is the place for Large Format, then the voices of discouragement are louder than encouragement. I think that is quite sad and a poor reflection upon this forum.
Criticism can lead to better products, but only if it is constructive. This product does compete with older leaf shutters, and I do think pricing is a consideration. However, compare this shutter to a Packard, and I think we would find different viewpoints. Does anyone here actually want this type of shutter in the market? I do.
Bookmarks