I promised my self not to go into this discussion, but now I am confused, and would like to understand..
(bear with me - I am a dumb Dane...)
If this is true, then Sandy's images shouldn't have been deleted(?).
He mentioned his camera, but the reason for showing it was - to quote you again: "The discussion, however, should be about the printing process (and/or the aesthetics involved)..."
reading the discussion (and being a dane with limited english knowlegde), it is exactely what Sandy argued he did (?)
Or was the mentioning of the original camera his crime?
I find it fascinating that almost ALL cameras can be used as start tool for alternative printing - it all ends up being unique LF images.
Highly inspiring, I must say.
Good to know!! I pass all this great information on to my students, and that way I lure them into Lf photography.
How great is that?
Bookmarks