I've been looking at the Nikkor 135mm/5.6 and wondering why it's not more popula r. At 200g it's smaller than it's nearest competitor, the 135mm/5.6 Rodenstock. It's image circle of 200mm is also only 8mm less than the Rodenstock, and it's $ 150 less expensive. Is there any reason why the Nikkor isn't the weight and pric e bargain it appears to be? Does anyone have experience with this lens?
Bookmarks