Page 13 of 32 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 312

Thread: are photographs still photographs...

  1. #121

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    congrats for all the sales

    although i would say that inkjet prints is a term that more would recognize

    archival pigment print...sounds like another sale of goods act moment to me

    why not us the term inkjet? (after all thats whats written on the box the archival pigment printer came in when purchased

  2. #122

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    833

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    Quote Originally Posted by pablo batt View Post
    congrats for all the sales

    although i would say that inkjet prints is a term that more would recognize

    archival pigment print...sounds like another sale of goods act moment to me

    why not us the term inkjet? (after all thats whats written on the box the archival pigment printer came in when purchased
    because i don't sell inkjets. I sell platinum prints. but i sell platinum prints of photographs i have taken with digital cameras

  3. #123

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    jim this comment was not really aimed solely at you, you do understand this?.

    it was aimed at the general inkjetter artists, be loud and proud and call them inkjet prints, and then there would be no heated discussion about it

  4. #124
    Wayne venchka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,872

    Cool Re: are photographs still photographs...

    Troll Alert! Troll Alert! Troll Alert! Troll Alert! Troll Alert!

    I've been following this with half an eye peeled to the email notifications.

    I have seen the word inkjet mentioned profusely. The word Giclée has not been mentioned. Or did I miss it?

    Giclée
    Wayne
    Deep in the darkest heart of the North Carolina rainforest.

    Wayne's Blog

    FlickrMyBookFaceTwitSpacei

  5. #125

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    haha giclee

    yes thats a bueaty, how misleading, someone should make a law to stop it happening

    oops i forgot there allready is one

  6. #126
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    "Photograph" is rarely used as the medium. Just as museums and galleries rarely list a work as a "painting" ... they'll say "oil on canvas," or "fresco," or "acrylic on aluminum."

    They typically use the name of the print process ... "gelatin silver print" or "platinum print" or "type c print" or "cibachrome print" or "photogravure" or "ferrotype" or "inkjet print" or "callotype" or "duratrans."

    Sometimes you'll see a construction like "Photograph | Rotogravure" or "Photograph | silver gelatin print"

  7. #127
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    Quote Originally Posted by pablo batt View Post
    ... someone should make a law to stop it happening

    oops i forgot there allready is one

    Cite a specific law or stop wasting everyone's time with your b.s..

  8. #128

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    well yes that goes without saying,museums are on a much tighter leash than a gallery.

    sales are generated mostly on the door

  9. #129

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam Nederlands
    Posts
    170

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    Cite a specific law or stop wasting everyone's time with your b.s..
    sales of goods act

  10. #130
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    Re: are photographs still photographs...

    Yeah, you mentioned that vague law. You have not cited any clause of that law or any case history that supports your argument.

    In contrast, I have found, with less than five minutes work, two major collections in the Netherlands that call inkjet prints photographs.

    Please learn to construct an argument. It's not the same thing as making noise and bugging people.

Similar Threads

  1. The Emergence of the Butterfly
    By Yaakov Asher Sinclair in forum On Photography
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Mar-2009, 02:22
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2008, 11:10
  3. The Event and The Image
    By John Flavell in forum On Photography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-Mar-2007, 05:39
  4. I've got the time, where to go for inspiration?
    By Kevin M Bourque in forum On Photography
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 6-Jun-2004, 07:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •