Sorry being away for some time. Great forum. Thanks all.
Hi Mark.
Thanks for your input. Let me think loudly.
Field cameras may be always better for landscape photography than monorail cameras.
But for one like me(who already have a Sinar F2 & one lens that cover 8X10 format), it should come with certain conditions:
1- Lens board of the field camera should be compatible with Sinar so I can use my sinar lens. If not, one adaptor at least is needed. Owning an 8X10 Sinar(wither P, P2 or F2) will increase compatibility in this side and in every direction.
2- Weight: The weight of an 8X10 field camera can range between 4 Kg(Wooden) to 6.8 Kg(Metal). The weight of 8X10 Sinar P2 is 8.2 Kg. While the Weight of my 4X5 Sinar F2 is little heavier than 3.6 Kg(due to auto behind lens shutter and metering back).
The estimated weight of my F2 with 8X10 metering back and 8X10 standard bellows(Sinar C) should be around(or lighter than) 7.25 Kg. To sum it up; there is extra weight of 0.5 to 3.25 Kg above most field cameras. And the new 8X10 Sinar C is equivalent in weight to two 4X5 Sinar F2, a weight seriously should affect any photographer performance in the outdoor.
Now, why I find much more complainers from the field cameras club(due to stability, precision & range of movements) than those from the monorail cameras club(due to weight & volume) ?
3- Price: a used Sinar 8X10 P is cheaper than the lowest priced new field camera and usually much cheaper than most of the good quality used field cameras(specially the Deardorffs).
Thanks again Mark.
.
Bookmarks