Page 291 of 655 FirstFirst ... 191241281289290291292293301341391 ... LastLast
Results 2,901 to 2,910 of 6546

Thread: Use of X-ray film: technical discussion with example images

  1. #2901

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Moe View Post
    Very nice. Scene gives me ideas. Process also interesting.

    Thanks
    Yeah, i got this doll for some collodion series, but ended up never starting it (was too hot here for 2 last months) Now that it cooling down i can start after all

  2. #2902

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dallas/Novosibirsk
    Posts
    2,205

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    Oh and after 30-35 minutes developer looks like REALLY dirty water and, what is interesting, fixer doesn't become as yellowish as with 12 minutes or less.

  3. #2903

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    14

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    The very first test picture, it's not bad, but in the future some little problem i will hope be solved.
    Film: XOE Retina (iso400), Rodinal 1+50, dev.: 7sec, in tank, rotated with my hand.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20141004_0026.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	67.1 KB 
ID:	122760

  4. #2904

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    I wonder if anyone has any idea why xray films clear so quickly in the fix? Given their extra density, that's the last thing I would expect.

    They also seem to dry quickly.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  5. #2905
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,092

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    As a semi-educated guess, the double emulsion films use a grain technology appropriate for a single emulsion at half the speed (because the double layer gives roughly twice the density for a given exposure), or about ISO 50 for "full speed" material -- and in general, the slower the emulsion, the smaller the halide grains and the faster they'll clear in the fixer. Further, they're cubic grain rather than tabular; tabular grain takes 2-3 times as long to clear for a given speed. A half speed double coated x-ray film probably has grain size comparable to one of the faster printing papers, which will fully fix in two minutes in rapid fixer; even the full speed version ought to fix almost as quickly as Ilford Pan F or an ortho litho copy film (which typically fix about like enlarging paper).
    If a contact print at arm's length is too small to see, you need a bigger camera. :D

  6. #2906

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Thanks.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  7. #2907
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,631

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    Regular film can clear pretty quickly too, but we don't see it as that's not done under safelight conditions.

  8. #2908
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,938

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    I turn on the lights as soon as the film (regular film) is in the fixer. TMX takes like 4-6 minutes to clear. Most others are a little less. But not nearly as fast as x-ray (instantaneously, pretty much).
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  9. #2909

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    3,326

    Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.

    I can't address the "how" aspect, but isn't x-ray film designed to have a much shorter processing time than regular film? I seem to remember my dental x-rays being dry and ready for viewing in three to four minutes.

    Jonathan
    Last edited by jcoldslabs; 5-Oct-2014 at 11:15. Reason: Duh.

  10. #2910

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    469

    Re: Images shot on X-ray film

    OK, it's normal orthochromatic film. I did not see if it is coated with emulsion on both sides. It is considerably easier to develop single sided films. Try a shot between 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM at 100 ASA sensitivity. Develop in a tray under a red safelight. The best safelights today are 3 or 12 Volt red LEDs. You can develop in 1 to 100 Rodinal, until the negative is done under the safelight.
    Quote Originally Posted by kanga View Post
    Someone has used this film?
    How can the sensitivity?
    Tolerate the red light?

    Attachment 122451

Similar Threads

  1. Technical Pan Film
    By Jehu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2016, 18:42
  2. Images, not technical discussions.
    By rdenney in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 14:16
  3. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2015, 12:01
  4. T Max 400 Technical Discussion by Sandy King
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7-Feb-2006, 06:08
  5. Discussion: Pyro stain, silver rich film & thick emulsion
    By Pete Caluori in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2003, 04:39

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •