Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: My Bellows Is Fine

  1. #21
    Yes, but why? David R Munson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Saitama, Japan
    Posts
    1,494

    My Bellows Is Fine

    One of my favorite cover shots to be sure...

  2. #22

    My Bellows Is Fine

    Well folks, I am truly humbled at your mastery of the English language. Who was it said we are a nation divided by a common language?

    Anyway, in Yorkshire bulls bellow and cows low! 'Bovine' is half of a nasty disease that badgers are reputed to spread and cattle used to be seen only on weekend matinees such as 'Rawhide'.

    As for my own bellows - well they is fine, certainly at 105mm, but I am replacing them anyway to prevent possible embarrasment when my super new ancient long lens arrives.

    DONNA@leefilters.com quotes #80 - ($120 and dropping)inclusive, to replace my 'Baby' Linhof 6x9 leather bellows with synthetic. This is far less than I had expected and I just wanted you all to share that fact!

  3. #23

    My Bellows Is Fine

    According to Webster's Tenth Collegiate Dictionary, 'bellows' is a plural noun, but is singular or plural in construction. Before you "vote for 'are,'" gentlemen, think how that sounds.

    Person A: "I think the bellows on my camera has a light leak." Person B: "I think the bellows on my camera have a light leak."

    Personally, I think person B sounds silly. Yes, we know that the instrument in question is, in fact, a series of folds, and thus constitutes a plural thing. But in common parlance, we do not refer to the individual pieces, but rather to the collectivity - the bellows - that they form.

    Yes, "Fish" and "Deer" are words that are both singular and plural, but they are conceptually different. We have just cause to refer to an individual fish - we may need to point out the one in the school that has red fins while others have blue, for example - or an individual deer, but we have no reason to refer to only one of the folds in a bellows, which is why it is an "it," not a "they." If we needed to point out the defect in one spot, we would refer to, say, the 6th fold OF the bellows as a whole, we wouldn't call it "the 6th bellow."

    One last note: the letter 's' does not necessary denote plurality. When the court orders you to appear, you receive a summons, not a summon.

Similar Threads

  1. What is fine art photography?
    By Leonard Metcalf in forum On Photography
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 26-May-2008, 04:50
  2. shooting fine art
    By Savanna in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 16-Jul-2006, 17:50
  3. dia-fine developer
    By martin_4668 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-Feb-2005, 10:42
  4. Bellows required for the new "Fine Art" lenses?
    By Jeff Corbett in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 27-Oct-2004, 12:21
  5. Fine Focus for D5
    By Gavin Bowden in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-Feb-2000, 01:30

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •