LITTMAN 45 SINGLE VI On EbaY 8,000

[Gary Williams]

I always thought it would be cool to buy one of these, but I think you have to be a moviestar to afford one. Is it worth it?
item # 290286184204

I never could understand how they gave Littman a patent on technology, that Polaroid and Graflex originally patented back in the 1940's- and said patents have already expired- i.e. instant film and the Graflok back.

that patent clerk must have just emigrated here from Pakistan or something....

Maybe I'll go out and patent the automobile today, and make billions $$$

[Drew Bedo]

I don’t think he patented the conversion per se. I read one of his patents online and my understanding was that he patented the connection method for attaching the back to the camera body. See threads here and on photo dot com that were posted early in the previous decade for the links.

[Craig Roberts]

This diatribe has exceeded its usefulness. Drop this post for all our sanity. Craig

[Drew Bedo]

Hello CR,

I aplolgize for the diatribe. I just thought there was some misunderstanding about what patents had been granted. I really meant no offence to anyone.

[Ash]

SOMEONE buy my Razzle?

I really need the cash to put toward a Littman.

[Gordon Flodders]

SOMEONE buy my Razzle?

I really need the cash to put toward a Littman.

What's the difference, apart from $5000?

GF.

[Ari]

As befits Hollywood fashion, we've given Mr Littman and his cameras much more attention than either deserved.

[Ash]

What's the difference, apart from $5000?

GF.

I don't know, but it looks like the Razzle is destined to stay in my hands :/

[Kirk Gittings]

If anyone wants this thread to die, they could stop bumping it with posts!

[Craig Roberts]

Kirk, please kill it. This is over the edge. Craig