Great for 4x5, marginal to inadequate coverage in 5x7. The 121 SA has tons of coverage for 5x7.
Great for 4x5, marginal to inadequate coverage in 5x7. The 121 SA has tons of coverage for 5x7.
NONSENSE, I use my 90mm f8 Super Angulon all the time for 5x7 b/w. It does have some fall off, but I know how to dodge and burn.
Example below, and I can surely say there was some front rise on that shot.
Excellent shot Gene!
"WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"
I have the Ilex clone of that lens. Dark to focus as others have said, but I love it for backpacking because of it's small size and light weight. I find more than enough coverage for 4x5 for my Tachihara.
joe
eta gosha maaba, aaniish gaa zhiwebiziyin ?
That's too much front rise.
Of course the coverage is limited on 5x7", and more than a hint of rise is too much!
Here's another, on 5x7" FP4+:
well, here's the image circle on 8x10, draw your own conclusions:
Erie, how much tilt did you use on that one? Also the vignetting is asymmetrical, which sort of defies the object if you intended to show the image circle.
I use and will continue to use mine on 5x7". At the same time I will use my 121mm f:8 SA on 18x24cm, but NOT on 8x10"...
Ole, I don't honestly remember, probably a bit, as the front stump is around 4" from the lens. I shot it last fall mostly as a quick test of the coverage limits.
I've had a few 121 SA slip through my hands, timing never was good, though I keep looking and hoping for either a 121 or a Nikon 120 SW
thanks guys for all the responses, I got the 90 SA today, havnt had any time to try it out though, i plan on trying it on my 5x7 also just to see what happens, its primary use though will be on my GII, thanks again for the help.
"WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"
Bookmarks