Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: My cheap solution to 4x10

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SouthWest
    Posts
    142

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    In a word CROP. Shot the picture and crop it. Craig

  2. #12

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    I put the 4x10 in the center of an 8x10 holder, taped, I have a lot of 8x10 holders so it's not a problem.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,794

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Isn't this the same basic idea Toho [Toyo?] did with their reducing holders?

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Joyce, Washington
    Posts
    1,437

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    What a great idea, nice job Eric.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    392

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Quote Originally Posted by IanMazursky View Post
    Really neat idea! It looks fantastic. Any film plane/sharpness issues?

    Ive been thinking about doing the same thing on my 12x20. 6x20 seems like an interesting format to me.
    I can probably make a single shot holder for 6x20 and cut down some of the old tri x 12x20 i have.
    Or a paper negative developed using a reversal bath....now im really interested...
    No issues found in the film plane thus far- and yes, I do believe this is similar to the Toyo reducing back, but far less expensive and much more readily available. I may try some of the ideas using the window cut into a darkslide- my only concern is remembering which half of the film is already exposed ( the downfall of being slightly absent minded) and having enough movement left on the standard after centering the sweet spot to get a back tilt in. The big advantage I see to that approach is that I develop my film myself and currrently with the 4x10 cut film I am only able to use 1 well per sheet with a Jobo and a 3005 drum- two prints on one sheet would cut down on my developing time and resources. As for shooting and cropping later- this is what I have been doing in the past- if I were wealthier Id probably keep doing just that

  6. #16
    3d Visual Effects artist
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Posts
    1,177

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Quote Originally Posted by luis a de santos View Post
    I have tried the half dark slide method also and it is very poor, not only you are using the wrong area of the sweet spot of the lens but also ,and very frequently, the slide moves and you get cut off, fog because of the edge poor seal and other problems.
    hm... I've had absolutely no problems with a cut darkslide Maybe I'm just lucky (I so use rise/fall to get the lens more centered though)
    Daniel Buck - 3d VFX artist
    3d work: DanielBuck.net
    photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com

  7. #17
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Great work-around, Eric!

    I use the modified 8x10 darkslide technique for B&W work...it has its advantages and disadvantages. At first, I did come home with a blank half and/or a double-exposed half! I try to make a point of exposing both 4x10's while out -- usually with the same image...sometimes with the same exposure to have a back-up neg.

    Centering the lens on the film and using movements is no trouble with my Zone VI (except with the Wollie 159mm). Precisely determining the framing of the negative in the inner portion of the 4x10 negs can be difficult. If one wants to give the two images different development, one must cut the negs in the dark before developing. Not too bad if one has a good reason to...can't say that I have done it.

    One is tossing in two extra steps into the process of taking a photograph (I have only left out that important "put the full darkslide back in" step once...it was enough!). But what I like is having the option of going both 8x10 and 4x10 and all I have to carry extra is a modified darkslide to make it possible. I made my modified darkslide using a metal slide -- after damaging a regular type in the field.

    Vaughn

  8. #18
    Is that a Hassleblad? Brian Vuillemenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Marin County, California
    Posts
    837

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Quote Originally Posted by eric black View Post
    I may try some of the ideas using the window cut into a darkslide- my only concern is remembering which half of the film is already exposed ( the downfall of being slightly absent minded) and having enough movement left on the standard after centering the sweet spot to get a back tilt in. The big advantage I see to that approach is that I develop my film myself and currrently with the 4x10 cut film I am only able to use 1 well per sheet with a Jobo and a 3005 drum- two prints on one sheet would cut down on my developing time and resources. As for shooting and cropping later- this is what I have been doing in the past- if I were wealthier Id probably keep doing just that
    Eric, to remember which half of the 8X10 sheet has been exposed, just put a little sticker (I use little round colored circle stickers available at many stores) on the film holder just above the half of the film that has been exposed. Also, when cutting the darkslide, cut out slightly less than half of it (to leave an unexposed border between the two shots) and cut in the shape of an "L" (to prevent light from getting in).
    Brian Vuillemenot

  9. #19
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Quote Originally Posted by luis a de santos View Post
    I have tried the half dark slide method also and it is very poor, not only you are using the wrong area of the sweet spot of the lens but also ,and very frequently, the slide moves and you get cut off, fog because of the edge poor seal and other problems.
    It sounds like you just cut a darkslide in half. The half-darkslide mask should be L-shaped, leaving the darkslide handle and about an 2-3 cm of darkslide along the handle intact (it should extend as far as possible without cutting off the image), so that the darkslide stays in position and completely closes the light trap. I've used this sort of mask without any problems.

    As for whether the lens can be centered over the frame, that will depend of course on the capabilities of the camera.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    217

    Re: My cheap solution to 4x10

    Eric, that is a great solution to your problem. At least you know your getting the frame centered, and you really can't argue with the price. I am going to try a modified darkslide (as some of the others suggested) if I have enough movements, otherwise I will do something similar I think.

    As for just cropping away half the image, anyone shooting 8x10 color will sadly shake their head at that thought.

    Evan

Similar Threads

  1. Shoot 4x10 with an 8x10 camera
    By Ling Z in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2008, 09:52
  2. 4x10 Lotus/ARCA-SWISS Hybrid
    By Kerry L. Thalmann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 15-Feb-2007, 15:58
  3. Old Formulas : Toners
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2-Apr-2005, 09:35
  4. Old Formulas : Film
    By Paul Fitzgerald in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19-Mar-2005, 21:31
  5. 4x10 Canham Holders do NOT fit my Lotus Camera
    By Kerry L. Thalmann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 5-Jan-2005, 19:00

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •